2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frameless stereotaxy in the nonhuman primate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stereotaxic paper atlases or stereotaxic coordinates from the interaural plane have also been used to guide placement of electrodes, cannulae or other probes into the brain for use in electrophysiological, or anatomical tracer injection studies, as well as making lesion in particular parts of the brain (Hampson et al, 2004;Lévesque and Parent, 2005;Saunders et al, 1990;Malkova et al, 1997;Murray and Mishkin, 1998). However, the extrapolation of 2D information from a particular atlas to a given animal's brain without neuronavigation techniques or registration procedures (Frey et al, 2004) is often difficult to accomplish. Furthermore, there is considerable variability across individual monkey brains and it is essential to have a method for locating anatomical differences amongst animals (functional or structural) while simultaneously preserving the established relationship between brain structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotaxic paper atlases or stereotaxic coordinates from the interaural plane have also been used to guide placement of electrodes, cannulae or other probes into the brain for use in electrophysiological, or anatomical tracer injection studies, as well as making lesion in particular parts of the brain (Hampson et al, 2004;Lévesque and Parent, 2005;Saunders et al, 1990;Malkova et al, 1997;Murray and Mishkin, 1998). However, the extrapolation of 2D information from a particular atlas to a given animal's brain without neuronavigation techniques or registration procedures (Frey et al, 2004) is often difficult to accomplish. Furthermore, there is considerable variability across individual monkey brains and it is essential to have a method for locating anatomical differences amongst animals (functional or structural) while simultaneously preserving the established relationship between brain structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maciunas and Galloway (1989), has previously described how a modified Brown-Roberts-Wells MRI compatible stereotaxic frame coupled with CT or MRI could be used in dog-based brain tumor experimentation, while similar rectilinear MRI-based stereotaxic procedures have been performed in monkeys aided by computerized image analysis (Subramanian et al, 2005). Use of frame-less stereotaxy in the non-human primate coupled with use of the clinical software (Brainsight Frameless, Rogue Research Inc.) giving a precision less than 1.2 mm has, likewise, been described by Frey et al (2004). Our device differs, because it is adapted for high-precision isocentric stereotaxy and uses a widely available clinical surgical planning system (SurgiPlan, Elekta AB, Sweden).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean weight of the heads was 2.96 ± 0.91 kg (1.92-4.62 kg). The stereotactic procedures were performed using the Brainsight TM frameless stereotactic system (Rogue Research Inc., Montreal, Canada) [36] with a modified bone implanted fiducial marker system [46,48,51,52]. After clipping of the coat and placement of the sheep head in the C-clamp, the fiducial marker post was fixed on the frontal bones caudal to one of the zygomatic processes to ensure that the registration markers were in different planes and not obstructing the surgical site.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%