1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-694x(96)00024-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
85
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Problem analysis involves understanding the design problem, setting goals, and defining constraints and requirements [27]. Authors were found to highlight a number of sub-activities involved in problem analysis, namely: information gathering [40]; inference [41,42]; problem decomposition [2,39,42,43]; identifying, exploring, clarifying, and prioritising constraints and requirements [40,44,45]; and problem reframing [46].…”
Section: Viewpoint 3: Design Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem analysis involves understanding the design problem, setting goals, and defining constraints and requirements [27]. Authors were found to highlight a number of sub-activities involved in problem analysis, namely: information gathering [40]; inference [41,42]; problem decomposition [2,39,42,43]; identifying, exploring, clarifying, and prioritising constraints and requirements [40,44,45]; and problem reframing [46].…”
Section: Viewpoint 3: Design Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study on the effect of prototyping constraints on design outcomes used the amount of materials, time, and task constraints as variables (Savage et al, 1998). One component of the explanation by Savage et al for the reduction of the range of design ideas with greater cost constraints was that perhaps the designer's "frame of reference" changed when constraints were introduced, reducing the solution space that the participants considered (Akin and Akin, 1996). However, the literature has also suggested the opposite; that greater constraints could lead to more novel results.…”
Section: Resource Constraints and Idea Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foregoing stance assumes a numerical problem solving context (the focus and context of ACCAM's implementation) in which domains are practice-based or procedurally-oriented. Generally, domain knowledge comprises of declarative and procedural knowledge (Ohlsson & Mitrovic, 2006;Akin, 1986Akin, , 2008. Learning in a numerate domain requires initial romance with the declarative aspect of knowledge (the first step in Whitehead's learning cycle-see Boyd, 2004).…”
Section: The Philosophical Stance-epistemological/ontological Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grundspenkis (2008) claims three types of knowledge are captured, namely domain knowledge, pedagogy knowledge and learner's knowledge. However, Akin (2008) conceives knowledge to be either declarative (propositional) or procedural knowledge. The latter knowledge dimensions can be argued not to be determinate or definitive.…”
Section: The Knowledge Representation (Kr) Schemementioning
confidence: 99%