1998
DOI: 10.2172/307834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for a comparative environmental assessment of drilling fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework will help identify potential impacts and benefits associated with the use of drilling muds [255]. A framework for a comparative risk assessment for the discharge of synthetic drilling fluids has been developed.…”
Section: Environmental Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework will help identify potential impacts and benefits associated with the use of drilling muds [255]. A framework for a comparative risk assessment for the discharge of synthetic drilling fluids has been developed.…”
Section: Environmental Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, each risk type is divided into elementary risk factors. The risk factors are ranked on a scale from 0 to 3, where a higher value represents a greater risk potential of that activity (Meinhold 1998). These risk factors are used for pairwise comparison using the methodology provided in Sadiq et al (2003a).…”
Section: Selection Of Drilling Fluids Using F-ahp: An Application Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meinhold [9] identifies the various impacts caused by drilling discharges that will be encountered in the sediment. Organic enrichment and toxicity both contribute to oxygen depletion (anoxia) within sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stressors have also been incorporated in the development of the present model. In addition, Meinhold [9] discusses the physical effects of the material deposited. This includes burial effects and changes of grain size caused by deposition of particles with diameters differing from the natural grain size at the drilling site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%