2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2008.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for controlled cost and quality of assumptions in finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the development and implementation of multiple subroutines, each covering different forming phenomena, requires excessive multi-disciplinary knowledge and is time-consuming. Subroutines are also typically run in series, and computing a series of these models in FE simulations would therefore be computationally very expensive, particularly with the increasing numbers of simulations being conducted due to the complexity of geometries being studied [26]. Alternatively, the utility of such advanced functions could be enhanced by developing them into FE software agnostic functional modules and subsequently running them simultaneously on a cloud-based platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the development and implementation of multiple subroutines, each covering different forming phenomena, requires excessive multi-disciplinary knowledge and is time-consuming. Subroutines are also typically run in series, and computing a series of these models in FE simulations would therefore be computationally very expensive, particularly with the increasing numbers of simulations being conducted due to the complexity of geometries being studied [26]. Alternatively, the utility of such advanced functions could be enhanced by developing them into FE software agnostic functional modules and subsequently running them simultaneously on a cloud-based platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some effective coupling analysis methods have been proposed during the past years, such as structure sharing in a product to enhance the resource effectiveness (Amaresh et al 2007), a systematic approach for minimising the time required through the selection of the physical model and an adapted mesh (Bellenger et al 2008), an integration of multi-domain dynamic simulation based on virtual prototyping for the design and analysis process (Bing et al 2007), the random factor method (RFM) for the natural frequency, mode shape and random vibration analysis of stochastic truss structures (Wei et al 2009) and so on. These coupling analysis methods can collaboratively carry out the integrated design, analysis and simulation for product development, which comprehensively applies the software tools of computer-aided design and analysis, including CAD and CAE, to improve the analysis efficiency and level (Anhu et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they refer to configurations where the shapes of components are identical in the design and simulation contexts. To help analysts, Bellenger [10], Troussier [11] and Peak [12] formalized simulation objectives and hypotheses applied to a design model when setting up simulations to capitalize and reuse them in future model preparations. This approach underlines the influence of simulation objectives and hypotheses without setting up formal connections with the shape transformations required.…”
Section: Tasks Versus Data Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%