1991
DOI: 10.1080/00207549108930046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for dynamic positioning of storage/retrieval machines in an automated storage/retrieval system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, there is no significant difference between the results obtained from the continuous-approach-based expressions and the ones from the discrete-approach-based solutions (Sari et al 2005). Discrete representation of the rack, for example, was investigated by Egbelu (1991), Thonemann and Brandeau (1998), Ashayeri et al (2002), Sari et al (2005) and so on. Continuous representation of the rack has received considerable interests since the study of Hausman et al (1976) and these literatures can be classified into two groups according to the shape of the AS/RS: (1) square-in-time and (2) rectangular-in-time.…”
Section: As/rs Travel Time Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, there is no significant difference between the results obtained from the continuous-approach-based expressions and the ones from the discrete-approach-based solutions (Sari et al 2005). Discrete representation of the rack, for example, was investigated by Egbelu (1991), Thonemann and Brandeau (1998), Ashayeri et al (2002), Sari et al (2005) and so on. Continuous representation of the rack has received considerable interests since the study of Hausman et al (1976) and these literatures can be classified into two groups according to the shape of the AS/RS: (1) square-in-time and (2) rectangular-in-time.…”
Section: As/rs Travel Time Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results show that the pursuit mode appears to be better than single addressing mode, and should always be used for AS/RS control strategy when both types of requests are available. Egbelu (1991) showed that the expected travel time of stacker crane could be obtained by summing the expected travel time to each location in the rack from an unknown dwell-point and then obtaining the expected travel time of stacker crane as a linear program. For this purpose, a linear programing methodology was developed which minimizes the service response time in an AS/RS through the optimal selection of the dwell-point of the stacker crane.…”
Section: Dwell-point Policy Of the Stacker Cranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linn and Wysk [7] proposed an expert-system-based AS/RS controller to search for storage and retrieval. Egbelu [8] minimized the service response time in the AS/RS by selecting the dwell point of the storage/retrieval machine. Mansuri [9] proposed a computerized algorithm to find the dedicated storage allocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang and Lim (1993) extended the Egbelu (1991) study by transforming one sub model into a single-facility location problem and developed an efficient algorithm to generate an optimal dwell point of SIR machines in AS/RS. Several dwell point specification strategies for SIR machines have been studied by Egbelu and Wu (1993) based on the simple rule-of-thumb policies by Bozer and White (1984) and dynamic strategies based on linear program developed by Egbelu (1991). Egbelu and Wu (1993) conducted a performance comparison by using average order turnaround time as the basis for comparison.…”
Section: Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies are easy to understand and implement, but they are static and cannot respond to changes in the SIR transactions in an AS/RS from period to period. Egbelu (1991) developed a dynamic optimal location strategy based on mathematical programming including two separated sub models to minimize the service response time. One sub model is to minimize the maximum SIR machine response time while the other solves the minimization of the expected response time.…”
Section: Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%