2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for structural damping predictor models based on stick-slip mechanism for use in wind-resistant design of buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So we can see that, compared to the results in still air, these two parameters will rise with the wind speed, then will decline after reaching the maximum value. This changing law is consistent with article [10], and that about the aerodynamic damping also meshes with article [11]. Note: '0' indicate the still air.…”
Section: Identification Methods For the Added Mass And Aerodynamic Damsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…So we can see that, compared to the results in still air, these two parameters will rise with the wind speed, then will decline after reaching the maximum value. This changing law is consistent with article [10], and that about the aerodynamic damping also meshes with article [11]. Note: '0' indicate the still air.…”
Section: Identification Methods For the Added Mass And Aerodynamic Damsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Being aware that the fundamental frequency of the structure along-wind, n 1x , has a value close to the expected frequency of gust loading, 0 f , for the structure with 5 sections, as shown in the Table 8, and considering that in the case of a difference of less than 33% between the expected frequency of gust loading and the fundamental frequency of the structure, the structural dynamic response to those gusts that have a duration close to the fundamental period of the structure becomes an amplification factor which can lead to resonance, phenomenon occurring in any flexible structure under the influence of wind, the paper proposes, in Table 9, the level of safety to be adopted in the installation/dismantling of the towers for the wind turbines considering only the dynamic action of the wind, where the main parameter has a variable governed by probability calculation. 1) averaged over a 10-minute period, determined at a height of 10 m and having annual probabilities of exceedance of 0.02. 2) for regions with peak velocity pressure q b =0.5 according with CR 1-1-4/2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the damping ratio also plays a significant role in the magnitude of the vibration responses of tall buildings. However, due to the complex energy dissipation of tall buildings, the damping ratios tend to be more sophisticated than the other modal parameters, and the identified damping ratio values always involve a much higher variability based on the current full‐scale measurement techniques (COV up to 70%) . In this work, the probabilistic distribution models and uncertainties of the modal frequencies and the damping ratios are identified based on the full‐scale measurement data of the monitored building by the RFBFFT method.…”
Section: Probabilistic Assessment Of Vibration Exceedancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the complex energy dissipation of tall buildings, the damping ratios tend to be more sophisticated than the other modal parameters, and the identified damping ratio values always involve a much higher variability based on the current full-scale measurement techniques (COV up to 70%). [48,49] In this work, the probabilistic distribution models and uncertainties of the modal frequencies and the damping ratios are identified based on the full-scale measurement data of the monitored building by the RFBFFT method. Table 5 lists the probabilistic distribution models and the statistics of the major random variables, that is, the modal frequencies, the modal damping ratios of the first three vibration modes, and the design mean wind speed.…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 99%