Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2513099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for the co-registration of MRI and histology images in prostate cancer patients with radical prostatectomy

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has great potential to improve prostate cancer diagnosis. It can spare men with a normal exam from undergoing invasive biopsy while making biopsies more accurate in men with lesions suspicious for cancer. Yet, the subtle differences between cancer and confounding conditions, render the interpretation of MRI challenging. The tissue collected from patients that undergo pre-surgical MRI and radical prostatectomy provides a unique opportunity to correlate histopathology images of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RAPSODI first reconstructs the histopathology volume, followed by a slice‐to‐slice alignment between the corresponding histopathology and T2w images. As shown in prior studies in the prostate 27,28 and other organs, 29–31 the reconstruction ensures the consistent stacking of the histopathology slices relative to each other, independent of the MRI, which results in a better initialization in the registration with the MR images. Unlike prior studies 27–31 that performed 3D registrations which are prone to overfitting due to a large number of degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RAPSODI first reconstructs the histopathology volume, followed by a slice‐to‐slice alignment between the corresponding histopathology and T2w images. As shown in prior studies in the prostate 27,28 and other organs, 29–31 the reconstruction ensures the consistent stacking of the histopathology slices relative to each other, independent of the MRI, which results in a better initialization in the registration with the MR images. Unlike prior studies 27–31 that performed 3D registrations which are prone to overfitting due to a large number of degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As shown in prior studies in the prostate 27,28 and other organs, 29–31 the reconstruction ensures the consistent stacking of the histopathology slices relative to each other, independent of the MRI, which results in a better initialization in the registration with the MR images. Unlike prior studies 27–31 that performed 3D registrations which are prone to overfitting due to a large number of degrees of freedom. RAPSODI performs the registration between MRI and corresponding histopathology images after reconstruction thus combining the benefits of the 2D registration to reduce the degrees of freedom with the 3D reconstruction to maintain 3D consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this segmentation, a 3D volume will be created, which is then imported into a modeling software to create a personalized mold such that the orientation of the prostate specimen is aligned with the original MRI to guide the gross sectioning of the ex vivo prostate to have exact slice correspondences with the MRI Priester et al (2014) . Several approaches Losnegård et al (2018) ; Rusu et al (2019) ; Wu et al (2019) rely on patient-specific 3D printed molds to establish better histopathology and MRI slice correspondences in order to improve the registration of MRI and histopathology images. While some approaches work directly with MR and histopathology images alone, others require additional steps including a separate ex vivo MRI of the prostate Wu et al (2019) , fiducial markers Ward et al (2012) , or advanced image similarity metrics Chappelow et al (2011) ; Li et al (2017) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some approaches work directly with MR and histopathology images alone, others require additional steps including a separate ex vivo MRI of the prostate Wu et al (2019) , fiducial markers Ward et al (2012) , or advanced image similarity metrics Chappelow et al (2011) ; Li et al (2017) . Several pipelines have been developed for direct integration of MR and histopathology images by 3D histopathology volume reconstruction Losnegård et al (2018) ; Rusu et al (2019) ; Samavati et al (2011) ; Stille et al (2013) , but most are time-consuming, computationally expensive, and can suffer from partial volume effects and artifacts due to large spacing between images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%