2015 Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS) Held Jointly With 2015 5th World Con 2015
DOI: 10.1109/nafips-wconsc.2015.7284149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework to identify and evaluate the cause of conflicts within a Matrix organization in construction industry using fuzzy expert system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fuzzy expert system was used to develop a framework to identify and evaluate the causes of conflicts within a matrix organization in the construction industry. This system will help develop a suitable organizational structure that meets the requirements of the construction industry [163].…”
Section: A New and Promising Area Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuzzy expert system was used to develop a framework to identify and evaluate the causes of conflicts within a matrix organization in the construction industry. This system will help develop a suitable organizational structure that meets the requirements of the construction industry [163].…”
Section: A New and Promising Area Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that affect organizations' performance must be fully understood to achieve success (Kaplan and Norton 1995), as well as diversity in the perception of success factors between different functional units within the same organization. A Critical Success Factors (CSFs) evaluation has been found to be the most appropriate methodology to assess and evaluate the organization's performance in order to achieve its main goal of developing a comprehensive monitoring system that contains corporate-wide indicators of success (Holohan 1992;Rathore et al 2015;. Tsiga et al (2016) identified 58 success factors that were then classified into 11 groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%