2006
DOI: 10.1108/14601060610678176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework to study the social innovation networks

Abstract: Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by LINKOPINGS UNIVERSITET For Authors:If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comWith over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…in R&D environments, remains challenging. On top of that, the social aspects of KPIs remain largely invisible to innovators [10,53,55]. Yet these social aspects and their influence on KPI scores can be valuable to innovators, for they may prove relevant for corporate social responsibility [9,30] and for aligning business strategy to R&D processes [56].…”
Section: Project Scoring and Evaluation Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in R&D environments, remains challenging. On top of that, the social aspects of KPIs remain largely invisible to innovators [10,53,55]. Yet these social aspects and their influence on KPI scores can be valuable to innovators, for they may prove relevant for corporate social responsibility [9,30] and for aligning business strategy to R&D processes [56].…”
Section: Project Scoring and Evaluation Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As several scholars have argued (e.g. Shove & Pantzar, 2005; see also Taatila et al, 2006), there is a need to achieve a better understanding of the mundane social practices that play a part in shaping the acceptance or rejection of innovations. Therefore, it is the identification and exploration of practices that becomes a key research task in the exploration of acceptance.…”
Section: Conceptual Practice-based Approach Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Ojasalo (2008), innovation and business networks belong together. Thus (Taatila et al, 2006), the importance of networks for innovation is widely accepted because networking extends competencies, capabilities and capacities , produces information flows and reduces transaction costs (Kalantaridis, 1996). Varis and Littunen (2010) propose that innovative firms collaborate to reduce the cost of technological development or market entry, to reduce risk in development or market entry, to achieve scale economies and to reduce the time taken to develop and commercialise new products.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%