2023
DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To be truly systematic, a well thought-out literature review depends on a transparent, reliable, and replicable way to recognize knowledge gaps among extant literature that allows room for critical evaluation (Paul & Criado, 2020;Paul, Merchant, et al, 2021). Paul and Criado (2020) suggest the main contribution of a systematic literature review is to provide state-of-the-art findings on a specific field and present insightful future directions by analysing the theories, contexts, and methods of existing studies (Hao et al, 2021;Lim et al, 2021;Paul et al, 2023;Paul, Merchant, et al, 2021). Based on Paul et al (2021, p. 337), framework-based reviews are more "informative, insightful and impactful" because they provide the greatest coverage of the review topic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be truly systematic, a well thought-out literature review depends on a transparent, reliable, and replicable way to recognize knowledge gaps among extant literature that allows room for critical evaluation (Paul & Criado, 2020;Paul, Merchant, et al, 2021). Paul and Criado (2020) suggest the main contribution of a systematic literature review is to provide state-of-the-art findings on a specific field and present insightful future directions by analysing the theories, contexts, and methods of existing studies (Hao et al, 2021;Lim et al, 2021;Paul et al, 2023;Paul, Merchant, et al, 2021). Based on Paul et al (2021, p. 337), framework-based reviews are more "informative, insightful and impactful" because they provide the greatest coverage of the review topic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TCCM framework is the most applicable for our goals as, first, it helps synthesize important theories, contexts, and methods key to scholarship on the commercial aspects of live streaming from multidisciplinary aspects (Paul et al, 2023). TCCM also serves as an efficient tool of the review process that yields an integrative study of characteristics analysis of independent variables, mediators, and dependent variables (D'Alessandro et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web of Science and Scopus, the databases identified as the most appropriate for conducting a systematic literature review (Paul et al, 2023), were used to search for articles on adopting or intending to adopt agricultural robots and UAVs in May 2023. The keywords used for selecting articles consisted of three parts and were developed based on existing reviews.…”
Section: Article Selection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions helped the researchers focus on the central topic and avoid subjective bias To address the questions, this study was designed based on the domain-based review method (Paul & Criado, 2020). A structured review approach was applied to systematically review, analyse and synthesize the knowledge (e.g., theories, contexts, methodologies, constructs and behavioural patterns) concerning the review questions in the domain of consumer behaviour in CBEC (Paul et al, 2023).…”
Section: Review Questions and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%