2021
DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs

Abstract: PURPOSE To understand trends, pathways, and experiences and to establish a framework for radiation oncology (RO) programs interested in developing global health (GH) initiatives. METHODS An in-depth interview was conducted of all US RO programs with established GH initiatives. Programs were identified by reviewing results of the 2018 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Global Health Resident Survey and individualized outreach to screen for additional programs meeting the following criteria: (1) acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collaborators in HICs often struggle with difficulty in procurement of funding for global health endeavors, minimal postgraduate training in global health competencies, unfavorable attitudes toward global health among departmental leaders, and difficulty adapting HIC guidelines to LMIC contexts. [31][32][33][34][35][36] Improving access to funding, training, and mentorship in global health among HIC providers would facilitate successful twinning partnerships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborators in HICs often struggle with difficulty in procurement of funding for global health endeavors, minimal postgraduate training in global health competencies, unfavorable attitudes toward global health among departmental leaders, and difficulty adapting HIC guidelines to LMIC contexts. [31][32][33][34][35][36] Improving access to funding, training, and mentorship in global health among HIC providers would facilitate successful twinning partnerships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%