Frameworks to envision equitable urban futures in a changing climate: A multi-level, multidisciplinary case study of New York City

Abstract

Cities are at the forefront of climate change action and planning for futures that are concomitantly more resilient and equitable, making local goals imperative for global sustainability. Under the multiple challenges of changing climatic, ecological and socio-economic conditions, cities need the means to meet these goals. We know cities are and will continue to be points of concentrated and diverse populations, socioeconomic vulnerability, amplified exposure, transformed ecosystems and are responsible for the bulk of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Yet, much is also unknown and intrinsically uncertain about urban futures: there is a range of potential plausible futures which have differing implications for both potential mitigation and adaptation actions. To better assess these plausible futures, the “global change” research community developed a framework including scenarios that are applicable for global and regional policy, entitled the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) and scenarios exploring future emissions that will drive climate change, entitled Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). Importantly, this global scale framework does not include specific city-level perspectives or data at the spatial scales necessary to address questions of local relevance. While the SSPs address many of the key population and socioeconomic drivers of climate change, they do not address important concerns that are particularly relevant to cities, such as racial justice, ecosystem change or migration. Nevertheless, city-level impacts will evolve, in part, as a function of the global scale change characterized by the SSPs, and in part based on demographic and social processes already underway. As such, applying a modification of this framework to cities has the potential to help limit local climate impacts, and create a more resilient, equitable city. To address these needs and respond to city and regional stakeholders, we propose a framework for science-based narratives and quantitative projections for cities and metropolitan areas, such as Greater New York City. In this paper, we review a wide-range of existing approaches to generate estimates of future populations and identify their vulnerabilities to climate-change hazards, ranging from subnational population projections or the spatially-explicit allocation of populations linked to SSPs for the US and selected cities, city-specific population forecasting without climate considerations, and participatory approaches to future scenario development and fine-scale, within-city land use change models. By showcasing the strengths and limitations of various approaches and modeling efforts, their spatial and temporal scales, and thematic breadth, we propose a novel framework that leverages state-of-the art quantitative approaches and couples it with stakeholder engagement that can help cities plan equitably under uncertainty.

Urbanization and Land Use Planning for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Case Study of Greece

“…The population was chosen to establish the most appropriate sample for the stud Therefore, a sample size of 384 different Greek government leaders was selected based a study population of 10,000 different government leaders across Greece. The sample s was calculated using Yamane's (1973) formula [68,69], as presented in Equation (1).…”

“…Important variables include direct drivers such as population expansion or infrastructure system modifications as well as indirect drivers such as energy transition processes. As a result, a wide range of land use disputes have arisen [1][2][3]. The negative implications of land use on combating climate change, protecting biodiversity, and sustaining vital ecosystem services are increasingly gaining prominence in political and scholarly discussions.…”

Population development as a driver of coastal risk: Current trends and future pathways

“…Balk et al 2022, Rohat et al 2021 and scale these up to the continental to global scale, thus allowing for a more integrative approach to understanding the temporal and spatial evolution of risk in coastal areas. Therefore, we would encourage future work that aims to extend and/or update the SSPs, to account for the specific characteristics of socioeconomic development in coastal locations in order Cattaneo C, Beine M, Fröhlich C J, KnivetonD, Martinez-Zarzoso I, Mastrorillo M, Millock K, Piguet E and Schraven B 2019 Human Migration in the Era of Climate Change Rev Environ Econ Policy 13 189-206 Chen J and Mueller V 2018 Coastal climate change, soil salinity and human migration in Bangladesh Nat Clim Chang 8 981-5 CIESIN 2011 Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project, Version 1 (GRUMPv1): Urban Extents Grid CIESIN 2000 Gridded Population of the World (GPW), Version 2.0 Online: http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/metadata/sample_record_pprint.html#DISTRIBUTION CIESIN, FAO and CIAT 2005 Gridded Population of the World, Version 3 (GPWv3): Population Count Grid CIESIN, IFPRI, The World Bank and CIAT 2011 Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project, Version 1 (GRUMPv1): Population Count Grid Clement V, Rigaud K K, De Sherbinin A, Jones B, Adamo S, Schewe J, Sadiq N and Shabahat E 2021 Groundswell Part 2: Acting on internal climate migration World Bank 1-362 Crespo Cuaresma J 2017 Income projections for climate change research: A framework based on human capital dynamics Global Environmental Change 42 226-36 Cutter S L, Boruff B J and Shirley W L 2003 Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards * Soc Sci Q 84 242-61 Dellink R, Chateau J, Lanzi E and Magné B 2017 Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways Global Environmental Change 42 200-14 Dodman D, Hayward B, Pelling M, Castan Broto V, Chow W, Chu E, Dawson R, Khirfan L, McPhearson T, Prakash A, Zheng Y and Ziervogel G 2022 Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.…”