This article explores the role of school improvement and systems change in urban schools through the lens of educational equity policy initiatives. By analyzing specific sets of national, state, and local education data, we examine the interaction between structural changes in American public education, collective, professional narratives about children, and their impacts on the work of schools. Using elements of a framework for systemic change, we examine local practice in urban classrooms, schools, and districts. Along with lessons learned from school improvement and technical assistance activities, these perspectives provide a scaffold for looking at how local activity arenas respond to federal and state policy and how the complexities of local practice could inform the next generation of policy initiatives. We take the stance that education policy should be designed to build the capacity of urban schools to provide high quality instruction, improve opportunities to learn, produce evidence of student accomplishment, and demonstrate positive post-school student outcomes.
Policy and Systems Change in Urban Schools 3The Role of Policy and Systems Change in Creating Equitable Opportunities for Students with
Disabilities in Urban SchoolsAny discussion of urban education and urban community must occur with clarity about the underlying assumptions that value some conditions and perspectives while marginalizing others. What urban reality is being observed, dissected, and improved? In the eyes of Jonathan Kozol (2005), it is the reality of structural and economic inequalities that conscribe some children to disadvantage while describing the same children as having richly developed powers of observation, a variety of intellectual, social, and artistic capacities, and a network of relationships that sustain them over time, despite the poverty of the institutional settings that are designed to educate them. Poverty, in particular, is linked to poor school outcomes and, as family circumstance improves, children's performance in school appears to improve as well (Berliner, 2006). And yet, children and families who live in a context of economic poverty have amazing sets of assets that are rarely recognized or built upon in the school curriculum (Lewis et al., 2008). Little consideration is given to the social networks and connections that exist within urban neighborhoods and communities (Harry, 2008). This deficit views translates into observations of what children cannot do, rather than understandings of the assets they bring with them to school (Gonzàlez, Moll, & Amati, 2005). Further, the historical legacies of racism, the differential treatment of immigrants and English language learners (adults as well as children) intersect with poverty in complex ways that continue to confound public educational policies and practices. As So, what do we mean when we say urban? Jean Anyon (1997) defines urban education as those schools and systems that provide schooling for students in inner corridor, densely populated communi...