2012
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2012.733950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing and global health governance: Key findings

Abstract: Despite widespread agreement that collective action to address shared health challenges across countries is desirable and necessary, the realm of global health governance has remained highly problematic. A key reason for this is the manner in which health issues are presented ('framed'). Because multiple frames are operating simultaneously, confusion and a range of competing policy recommendations and priorities result. Drawing on the previous articles published in this Special Supplement, these key findings e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regional level is thereby seen as a potential source of progressive policy-making, complementing or substituting national levels, which are perceived as underperforming. This is very much in line with the orientation of the broader literature (and normative theorizing) on global health governance ( Lee and Kamradt-Scott, 2014 ; McInnes et al, 2012 ; McInnes and Lee, 2012 ). While we recognize that especially in cases of border-crossing health issues (communicable diseases, migration-related health issues, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The regional level is thereby seen as a potential source of progressive policy-making, complementing or substituting national levels, which are perceived as underperforming. This is very much in line with the orientation of the broader literature (and normative theorizing) on global health governance ( Lee and Kamradt-Scott, 2014 ; McInnes et al, 2012 ; McInnes and Lee, 2012 ). While we recognize that especially in cases of border-crossing health issues (communicable diseases, migration-related health issues, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The concepts of problem definition and positioning are linked also in that both are grounded in a social constructionist perspective: issue portrayals are not dictated by a fixed external reality, but rather are constructed by actors concerned with the problem. 16,21-23 …”
Section: The Four Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…141 The necessity for reorientating and redefining IR 142 is brought into stark focus when we consider the realm of global health. 143 As contemporary health crises emerge as issues of 'high politics' 144 Multi-stakeholder health diplomacy is useful for extending our understanding of the complexity of health diplomacy beyond monolithic state and donor actors to the crucial role of other actors -including donors, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), private philanthropists and private sector health providers; and the individual technical advisors, programme managers and consultants working within these organisations. It is significant in African contexts such as Malawi where there is acute dependency on resources and health is an important point of leverage to exert influence, which can readily be framed as benevolent .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%