Framing Blended Learning, Teaching and Education

Goeman, Katie; Poelmans, Stephan; Rompaey, Veerle Van

doi:10.21125/iceri.2018.1376

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The desk research resulted in a general conceptual and operational framework, the blueprint of EMBED. It includes the outline of key terminology principles on blended learning, teaching and education (see also Goeman, Poelmans, & Van Rompaey, 2018). It allows researchers, practitioners and policymakers to talk common language and design, develop and assess current practices, strategical and implementation conditions in a systematic manner.…”

Section: Conceptual and Descriptive Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Embedding Blended Learning Environments in Higher Education: Towards a European Maturity Model

Goeman

Poelmans

Rompaey

et al. 2019

JECP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Partnership in Higher EducationThe “European Maturity Model for Blended Education” (EMBED) is a higher education (HE) project (2017-2020) led by a consortium of universities across Europe: KU Leuven, TU Delft, the University of Edinburgh, the University of Aarhus, Dublin City University and Tampere University of Applied Sciences. It is coordinated by The European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU) and funded by the European Commission. Aim is to support institutions when introducing, developing and implementing blended learning (BL) in HE. A reference model is created that encompasses all levels of an institution: the design of a course, organisational aspects such as policy making, staff support, training and leadership, while guarding the institution’s quality culture. Internal stakeholders include learners, teaching staff, support services, technology departments and university leaders, while external stakeholders are key persons responsible for policy making such as governments, European university networks and the EU.

show abstract

Section: Conceptual and Descriptive Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%