2012
DOI: 10.1260/0958-305x.23.2-3.375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Co2 Storage Risk: A Cultural Theory Perspective

Abstract: This research note discusses risk perceptions of CO2 storage from a cultural theory perspective. Data for consideration is drawn from several publications by key stakeholders in the CO2 storage risk debate, as well as studies of (lay) public perceptions of risk. Two strands of further research are proposed based on the data, and a claim is made that publications from one stakeholder, the EU Commission, strongly indicate a risk framing that conforms to the hierarchical typology within cultural theory. Suggestio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, Americans tend to require a more objective assessment of benefits and costs in the case of uncertainty and rely on market mechanisms to achieve cost-effective emissions reductions. Eva 33 discussed the risk perceptions of CO 2 storage from a cultural theory perspective. The author applied the cultural theory framework to the debate on CO 2 storage risk and focused specifically on the view developed in the EU Commission's carbon capture and storage directive and the associated guidance documents.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Americans tend to require a more objective assessment of benefits and costs in the case of uncertainty and rely on market mechanisms to achieve cost-effective emissions reductions. Eva 33 discussed the risk perceptions of CO 2 storage from a cultural theory perspective. The author applied the cultural theory framework to the debate on CO 2 storage risk and focused specifically on the view developed in the EU Commission's carbon capture and storage directive and the associated guidance documents.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%