Between Families and Frankenstein 2018
DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520298187.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Egg Donation at the State Level

Abstract: This chapter begins a response to the questions of what creates the unique system of egg donation regulations by examining the ways that stakeholders—legislators, advocates, scientists, and invested citizens—frame the issue of egg donation in reproduction and research. I explore one policy area of egg donation politics in the United States, compensation in California, New York, Arizona, and Louisiana between 1990 and 2010. This chapter explores and illuminates framing processes about egg donation through expla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This moves us away from a position of thinking about ‘donation’ as a unitary or homogenous entity, or one whose form depends on individual ‘motivations’ and instead gives rise to an understanding of egg provision as a specific, embedded and heterogenous practice. It also permits attention to be given to the voices of egg providers, who are often omitted—as biocitizens (Happe et al., 2018 )—from debates about the politics and policy surrounding egg donation (Haimes, 2015 ; Heidt‐Forsythe, 2018 ). In the context of differing donation regimes, we can consider how providers’ experiences shift in relation to the new range of options opened up by vitrification, whether individuals are informed about these options and what this tells us about the wider regulatory regime prioritised in each country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This moves us away from a position of thinking about ‘donation’ as a unitary or homogenous entity, or one whose form depends on individual ‘motivations’ and instead gives rise to an understanding of egg provision as a specific, embedded and heterogenous practice. It also permits attention to be given to the voices of egg providers, who are often omitted—as biocitizens (Happe et al., 2018 )—from debates about the politics and policy surrounding egg donation (Haimes, 2015 ; Heidt‐Forsythe, 2018 ). In the context of differing donation regimes, we can consider how providers’ experiences shift in relation to the new range of options opened up by vitrification, whether individuals are informed about these options and what this tells us about the wider regulatory regime prioritised in each country.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egg donation is subject to varying national governance and professional cultures, which shape its practice and regulation (Bühler, 2014; Cattapan, 2016; Heidt-Forsythe, 2018). The process of selecting a donor and the management of information around that donation therefore differs significantly between countries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beliefs about abortion are among the culture war's most divisive political issues, with abortion attitudes exemplifying the various ways in which religious traditions influence political opinions (Kellstedt et al 1996; Layman and Green 2006; Wald and Calhoun-Brown 2014). Abortion attitudes constitute a form of morality politics in which values and beliefs influence policy views (Heidt-Forsythe 2018; Schroedel 2000; Silber Mohamed 2018; Tatalovich and Daynes 2011).…”
Section: What Drives Abortion Attitudes?mentioning
confidence: 99%