2023
DOI: 10.1177/00380261221150080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing stigma as an avoidable social harm that widens inequality

Abstract: This article discusses the social harms arising out of stigma experienced by people who use drugs (PWUD), and how stigmatisation compromises ‘human flourishing’ and constrains ‘life choices’. Drawing on Wellcome Trust qualitative research using in-depth, semi-structured interview data ( N = 24) with people who use heroin, crack cocaine, spice and amphetamine, this article firstly provides insight into how stigma is operationalised relationally between people via a lens of class talk and drug use predicated on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By drawing on the lens of relational autonomy, a key contribution of the study is that we highlight not just the material impact of economic deprivation, but also how poverty led to diminished feelings of self-worth among our participants which were, in turn, exacerbated by the continued stigma attached to substance use and mental illhealth [82]. Relational feminist theorists and sociologists underscore how stigma, as a structural form of oppression, inhibits people's capacity to act autonomously in the context of substance use [44,47,82]. Indeed, as well as shaping interactions with formal care professionals, the impact of stigma was evident in people's accounts of help -seeking within their personal relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By drawing on the lens of relational autonomy, a key contribution of the study is that we highlight not just the material impact of economic deprivation, but also how poverty led to diminished feelings of self-worth among our participants which were, in turn, exacerbated by the continued stigma attached to substance use and mental illhealth [82]. Relational feminist theorists and sociologists underscore how stigma, as a structural form of oppression, inhibits people's capacity to act autonomously in the context of substance use [44,47,82]. Indeed, as well as shaping interactions with formal care professionals, the impact of stigma was evident in people's accounts of help -seeking within their personal relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comments reflect what Addison (p. 308, [16]) refers to as stigma-induced 'ugly feelings'. Women reflected when alone and with others, including watching CCTV footage with police officers.…”
Section: Stigma Relationship Tensions and Exploitation Appearances An...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Punitive approaches can deter people from treatment; for example, state child removal fear is a barrier to women seeking help for alcohol use [12], and child removal can trigger increased substance usage [13,14]. Structural issues can exacerbate substance usage [15,16], and Link and Phelan [17] identify a power requirement to stigmatise others, for example, social, economic, and political power. Ultimately, punitive drug legislation creates 'state-driven stigma', disproportionately harming women, including violence and incarceration [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rapid shift, alluded to by Jones [ 38 ], has seen stigma (norms marking an ontological deficit, non-conformance or shame) being redefined as deviance (norms marking a moral deficit, non-compliance or blame), ‘skewing’ social norms of shame and blame, which Scambler [ 33 ] terms as a “weaponising of stigma”. Thus, stigma operates as a powerful tool to police and regulate the most marginalised [ 39 ]. Lone mothers, in particular, have been branded “failed neoliberal subjects” (p. 232, [ 40 ]), as vessels of unregulated and amoral female sexuality and therefore a threat to society [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%