Framing-Strategien in der Klimakommunikation von Industrieakteuren

Schlichting, Inga

doi:10.1007/978-3-531-94217-9_3

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the way information is framed by the media has consequences for the audience, it is imperative to look at the framing of controversial topics. This holds true for climate change where different actors (e.g., politicians, scientists, and lobbyists) are trying to circulate their frames and messages (Nisbet, 2009;Schlichting, 2012).…”

Section: Framing Climate Changementioning

confidence: 96%

Questioning the Doubt: Climate Skepticism in German Newspaper Reporting on COP17

Kaiser¹,

Rhomberg²

2015

Environmental Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite numerous international studies on climate change, there is skepticism in the media and it is prominent in public opinion polls. This article focuses in particular on the framing of climate skepticism in Germany, a country that, in the main, is said to be convinced about climate change. By using a two-step content analysis of 379 news articles (print and online) we demonstrate that climate skepticism is present in German news media reporting on the 17th Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Durban, South Africa. We identify two overarching skepticism frames: skepticism about the phenomenon of climate change and about climate science. Our analysis further shows that climate skepticism is not exclusive to a specific political ideology, even though a newspaper's ideology may influence how skeptical frames are being evaluated.

show abstract

Section: Framing Climate Changementioning

confidence: 96%

Questioning the Doubt: Climate Skepticism in German Newspaper Reporting on COP17

Kaiser¹,

Rhomberg²

2015

Environmental Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A notable exception is Schlichting's (2013) meta-analysis, in which she synthesized 38 scholarly studies on strategic framing aiming to provide an integrative typology and a timeline for climate change communication by "industry actors" in Western countries. Often they aim at reconstructing topical content frames, i.e., climate change-specific, non-generic frames (e.g., Gupta, 2010;Newell, 2000), and they do so employing hermeneutic-qualitative, sometimes also manual holistic framing methods (e.g., Schlichting, 2012Schlichting, , 2013.…”

Section: Analyzing Stakeholder Framingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resilience

Schäfer¹,

O’Neill²,

Nisbet³

et al. 2015

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is an advance summary of a forthcoming article in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Please check back later for the full article. Addressing climate resilience has become a political, economic, and ethical challenge of the 21st century. The threats posed by climate change along with associated stresses on water, land, and food security are expected to impact the lives and livelihoods of millions of people around the world. Social systems are also rapidly changing, influenced by aging populations, urbanization, population growth, and global markets. These changes pose major challenges to poverty eradication and livelihood security under a changing climate. In a world that is unpredictable, and consists of vulnerabilities and risks, many people remain poor, marginalized, discriminated against, and dependent on powerful elites. Resilience is a complicated and evasive concept that has its roots in ecological theory. Increasingly, the concept is used to explore the interface between society and environment. Some consider that resilience is a process and sustainability is an outcome. Resilience is distinct to vulnerability and adaptation but needs to be defined in relation to these concepts. Resilience principles can be used to understand better how societies adapt and transform in the face of climate risk. Nevertheless, resilience is a contested concept. It is often criticized by scholars for the lack of a common definition. It is associated with systems thinking and considered devoid of describing power and agency. Measuring resilience is work still in progress. Given the practical and conceptual challenges posed by climate change risks, how can resilience as a process help societies to better understand ways to continue to develop under stress for the benefit of societies and the environment? In particular, given that societies’ needs and environmental boundaries are often seen to be in conflict, can resilience be used as a way to reconcile these differences and help trigger ideas for creative transformations under a changing future climate?

show abstract

Sustainability as Master Frame of the Future? Potency and Limits of Sustainability as Normative Framework in Corporate, Political and NGO Communication

Weder

2021

The Sustainability Communication Reader

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Framing-Strategien in der Klimakommunikation von Industrieakteuren

Cited by 3 publications

References 51 publications

Questioning the Doubt: Climate Skepticism in German Newspaper Reporting on COP17

Questioning the Doubt: Climate Skepticism in German Newspaper Reporting on COP17

Resilience

Sustainability as Master Frame of the Future? Potency and Limits of Sustainability as Normative Framework in Corporate, Political and NGO Communication

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About