Contested Cities and Urban Activism 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1730-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Urban Movements, Contesting Global Capitalism and Liberal Democracy

Miguel Angel Martínez López
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we stress the contentious features of social interaction within any demarcated field, along with the role of social capital and political power. Such factors can induce structural change, in accordance with theories that bridge "contentious politics" and "political economy" approaches (Martínez, 2019).…”
Section: Contentious Actors In Changing Contextssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we stress the contentious features of social interaction within any demarcated field, along with the role of social capital and political power. Such factors can induce structural change, in accordance with theories that bridge "contentious politics" and "political economy" approaches (Martínez, 2019).…”
Section: Contentious Actors In Changing Contextssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Drawing on the theoretical insights provided by the field approach (Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1992;Fligstein & McAdam, 2011;Townley, 2014) and social movements scholarship (Martínez, 2019;Mayer & Boudreau, 2012;Tilly & Tarrow, 2007), we examined the evolution of cycling activism in Guangzhou. This activism, we argue, produced significant changes in the field of urban cycling due to its effective mobilization of social networks, alliances, and coalitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I suggest adopting a critical perspective in which class analysis and political economy take precedence; however, the incorporation of 'contentious politics' and other specific concerns related to the urban and housing questions are also crucial (Alford & Friedland 1985, Barker et al 2013, Della Porta 2015, Goodwin & Jasper 2004, Judge et al 1995, Pickvance 1995. This engages with a specific attempt at understanding how 'socio-spatial structural contexts' shape movements, how agencies and identities of movements unfold within those contexts, and which outcomes are actually produced (Martínez , 2019. I also look at the 'effective radicalisation' of urban movements when facing the increasing commodification of housing, gentrification processes, and intersectional injustices (across class, gender, and ethnic lines) (Bhattacharya 2017, Lees et al 2016).…”
Section: Squatting As An Urban Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%