2005
DOI: 10.1080/10417940509373330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Framing usefulness:” An examination of journalistic coverage of the personal computer from 1982–1984

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People were motivated to take privacy protection behavior and support governmental regulation. These findings confirm that people's evaluation of and behavioral reactions to an innovative technology-driven practice are often influenced by the ways with which the innovative practice is framed in the press coverage (Cogan, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…People were motivated to take privacy protection behavior and support governmental regulation. These findings confirm that people's evaluation of and behavioral reactions to an innovative technology-driven practice are often influenced by the ways with which the innovative practice is framed in the press coverage (Cogan, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Fourth, a regulatory frame in which political actions caused technological developments, which consequently induced political regulations. Cogan (2005) and Kelly (2009) studied the media coverage of computers between the 1970s and 1990s and found that the coverage of social digitization mainly consisted of highlighting the personal utility of digital devices. During this period, the media were prone to ignore the negative technological or societal consequences such as hacking and potential risks to children.…”
Section: Media Coverage On Social Digitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brennen et al ( 2018 , p.1) found that the recent UK media treatment of artificial intelligence (AI) was also generally positive, ‘portraying AI as a relevant and competent solution to a range of public problems [….] with little acknowledgement of on-going debates concerning AI’s potential effects.’ Arceneaux and Schmitz Weiss ( 2010 ) observed that early coverage of Twitter, like that of personal computers (Cogan 2005 ), was consistently positive, heralding everything from its ability to ‘make valuable business contacts or find jobs’ (p. 9) to facilitating political mobilization and ‘access to political information’ as politicians embraced it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%