2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37367-2_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

France: Submerged Prehistory on Atlantic and Mediterranean Coasts

Abstract: The French coastline accounts for many submerged remains of prehistoric sites along all its coastlines. Undisturbed sites including intertidal deposits containing artefacts give a total of 180 find spots. Each geographical region has its own specific features: submerged peats and fish weirs along the Channel and Atlantic coasts, faunal assemblages from the Channel and the North Sea, underwater sea caves and karsts along parts of the Mediterranean coast and occupations dated to later prehistory on the Mediterra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is sometimes accepted uncritically on the grounds of proximity to the adjacent shoreline and the greater exposure of the shoreline and the intertidal zone to turbulent wave action. However, there are many cases of independently dated sites in the modern intertidal zone in other parts of the world that demonstrably do belong to a pre-inundation land surface, just as there are examples of fully subtidal sites suspected of being displaced from the adjacent land surface and washed into the sea (Bailey, Galanidou, et al, 2020;Bailey, Momber, et al, 2020;Bayón & Politis, 2014;Bicho et al, 2020;Billard et al, 2020;Galanidou et al, 2020;Galili et al, 2020;Glorstad et al, 2020;Jöns et al, 2020;Peeters & Amkreutz, 2020;Pieters et al, 2020;Rossi et al, 2020;Westley & Woodman, 2020). The key issue in every case is not whether artifacts are intertidal or subtidal, but whether they were first discarded by cultural activity on a pre-inundation land surface.…”
Section: Intertidal or Subtidalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is sometimes accepted uncritically on the grounds of proximity to the adjacent shoreline and the greater exposure of the shoreline and the intertidal zone to turbulent wave action. However, there are many cases of independently dated sites in the modern intertidal zone in other parts of the world that demonstrably do belong to a pre-inundation land surface, just as there are examples of fully subtidal sites suspected of being displaced from the adjacent land surface and washed into the sea (Bailey, Galanidou, et al, 2020;Bailey, Momber, et al, 2020;Bayón & Politis, 2014;Bicho et al, 2020;Billard et al, 2020;Galanidou et al, 2020;Galili et al, 2020;Glorstad et al, 2020;Jöns et al, 2020;Peeters & Amkreutz, 2020;Pieters et al, 2020;Rossi et al, 2020;Westley & Woodman, 2020). The key issue in every case is not whether artifacts are intertidal or subtidal, but whether they were first discarded by cultural activity on a pre-inundation land surface.…”
Section: Intertidal or Subtidalmentioning
confidence: 99%