Neolithic caves in the Aegean are conventionally understood in domestic terms, principally as temporary homes for farmers or pastoralists. This paper challenges the theoretical and empirical foundations of this orthodoxy and develops an alternative model grounded in an understanding of Neolithic ritual and how through ritualization the everyday is referenced and transformed. This model is explored with reference to the corpus of wellpublished cave-sites. Although further testing remains a priority, facilitated by the development of new ways of studying cave assemblages, ritual explanations are considered to provide a more credible explanation for Neolithic cave-use in all its aspects, from the selection of caves as locales for activity to the complexity and diversity of their material records. In this way the Aegean may be seen to fit within a broader pattern of ritual cave-use in the Mediterranean during the Neolithic and Chalcolithic.Caves exercise a power of attraction over people, suggesting themselves as places for activity, demanding explanation. For archaeologists in search of the Aegean prehistoric past, caves were a primary target of investigation (e.g. Perlès 2001, 116) to the extent that in some areas they have become an over-represented site type for certain phases of human existence. After more than a century of exploration a large number of Neolithic cave-sites are known, the majority from surface collections or small trials, some from larger excavations, of which a small number have been fully published (Figs. 1 and 2; Table 1). What attracted the people of the Neolithic to these caves has long been considered uncontroversial. The popular perception that Stone Age people were cave-dwellers by preference has been reinforced by traditions of cave usage from the recent Greek past. Neolithic caves must have been domestic sites, perhaps temporary homes for farmers or transhumant pastoralists, refuges for threatened communities, places for banishing the wicked, quarantining the sick or storing perishable goods (e.g. Hood ). In time the domestic model has come to be viewed as self-evident, the default interpretation of Neolithic cave-use. Data from caves have generally been used to illustrate rather than evaluate the efficacy of the domestic model and the onus of proof has been placed upon those seeking alternative explanations.