1965
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.14.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Franz-Keldysh Effect above the Fundamental Edge in Germanium

Abstract: 1 FEBRUARY 1965 gy for ZnS:Ag, Er than for ZnS:Cu, Er. This sensitivity of the rare-earth spectrum to the specific group-I6 element used implies that the two ions are closely associated.The previous discussion pertains only to ZnS and CdS. We have also found that the addition of Cu to ZnSe strongly enhances the intensity of rare-earth fluorescence. ZnSe:Cu,Er, for example, emits most strongly from the transition 4 S 3/2 -4 / 15/2 at 18 100 cm"" 1 . As in the case of ZnS and CdS, preparative conditions favor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modulation of the dielectric function ε(ω) in the presence of electromagnetic fields has been a subject of investigation for many years. The change under a static electric field is known as the Franz-Keldysh effect (FKE) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and that under an alternating electric field is known as the dynamical FKE (DFKE) [17][18][19][20][21][22]. An important parameter which distinguishes DFKE from the static FKE is the adiabaticity parameter γ = U p /Ω, where U p = e 2 E 2 /4µΩ 2 is the ponderomotive energy, and Ω is the frequency of the field, µ is the reduced mass of the electron, and E is the electic field [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modulation of the dielectric function ε(ω) in the presence of electromagnetic fields has been a subject of investigation for many years. The change under a static electric field is known as the Franz-Keldysh effect (FKE) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and that under an alternating electric field is known as the dynamical FKE (DFKE) [17][18][19][20][21][22]. An important parameter which distinguishes DFKE from the static FKE is the adiabaticity parameter γ = U p /Ω, where U p = e 2 E 2 /4µΩ 2 is the ponderomotive energy, and Ω is the frequency of the field, µ is the reduced mass of the electron, and E is the electic field [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of piezoreflectance [10], stress-strain cycles are imposed on the sample, usually by means of a piezoelectric actuator attached to the sample, whereas in thermoreflectance [11], the sample is subjected to thermal cycles induced, for example, by a Peltier element. The same applies to electroreflectance (ER), making use of an externally applied modulated electric field on the sample [12]. Even when each modulation mechanism is executed at a reference frequency thereby used for detection, the detection itself is in principle not constrained to a certain photon energy range of the probe beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modulation of ε(ω) in the presence of electromagnetic fields has also been the subject of investigation for many years. The change under a static electric field is known as the Franz-Keldysh effect (FKE) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], and under an alternating electric field is known as the dynamical FKE (DFKE) [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%