2017 Tenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ic3.2017.8284299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fraud detection and frequent pattern matching in insurance claims using data mining techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No evidence of physician altruism was found, based on Finnish data. Thornton, Mueller, Schoutsen, and Hillegersberg (2013) Thornton et al, 2013and Verma, Taneja, & Arora, 2017, and Li, Huang, Jin, & Shi, 2008 provided a survey).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No evidence of physician altruism was found, based on Finnish data. Thornton, Mueller, Schoutsen, and Hillegersberg (2013) Thornton et al, 2013and Verma, Taneja, & Arora, 2017, and Li, Huang, Jin, & Shi, 2008 provided a survey).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…usnews.com/health-care/health-insurance/articles/2018-11-13/howto-avoid-medicare-scams.10 The 2015 Internet Crime Report formally defines identity theft as, "Someone steals and uses personal identifying information, like a name or Social Security number, without permission to commit fraud or other crimes, and/or (account takeover) a fraudster obtains account information to perpetrate fraud on existing accounts" p. 228.11 It is possible that both identity thefts and medical fraud result from a general weakness in institutions related to governance (seeGoel, 2019 for some evidence related to identity fraud).12 Additional details are available upon request.13 A related aspect, that we are unable to account for, may be the market power of medical professionals(McGuire, 2000). 14 The cross-sectional nature of the analysis prevents us from including state-specific dummy variables that might account for, among other things, the differences in enforcement/laws targeting nurses and physicians accused of fraud (see https://statelaws.findlaw.com/health-carelaws.html).15 See AlSaidi and Zeki (2019),Batra and Kundra (2019), andVerma et al (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraud detection and frequent pattern matching in insurance claims using data mining techniques [44] Kmeans clustering and association rule mining and Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Study Name and Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many statistical techniques are also used to generate decision rules and k-means clustering is applied on a time series-based insurance claim data for the identification of anomalies and outliers. These disease-based outliers are used to detect the fraud related activities [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%