2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fraudulent Use of Digital Radiography: Methods To Detect and Protect Digital Radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technology discussed by eight of the collected papers was digital photography and digital radiography [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Among them, four articles [51,53,55,56] highlighted that image modification, made easier by digitalization of both dental photography and radiography, could result in misconduct in science and fraudulent use of modified pictures. Practitioners could be tempted to modify radiographs to deceive insurance companies [51] and researchers might do the same to falsify the results of their research [55].…”
Section: Digital Photography and Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technology discussed by eight of the collected papers was digital photography and digital radiography [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Among them, four articles [51,53,55,56] highlighted that image modification, made easier by digitalization of both dental photography and radiography, could result in misconduct in science and fraudulent use of modified pictures. Practitioners could be tempted to modify radiographs to deceive insurance companies [51] and researchers might do the same to falsify the results of their research [55].…”
Section: Digital Photography and Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some papers also highlighted some potential solutions. Regarding image modification, the application of state-of-the-art anti-forgery techniques was suggested [51], as well as the development of appropriate guidelines to set an acceptable standard for image modification in dentistry [53]. As for image sharing issues, Stieber et al [57] suggested the implementation of a privacy compliant framework, where informed consent is enhanced in order to give patients more control over how their images are used, while Indu et al [52] proposed the use of only custom apps built exclusively for medical data sharing.…”
Section: Digital Photography and Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraudulent manipulation of images implies a problem of legal certainty, since it makes possible to fraud in dealings with medical insurance, for instance, for unrealized treatments when a manipulated radiograph is shown, can be considered as performed. 6,7 Calberson et al 8 made clear in 2008 how easy it is to manipulate a radiograph, describing methods for identifying such manipulation, and at present such manipulation can be prevented. In this sense, the studies on image manipulation in dentistry are few 4e6 and practically all were carried out before the improvements which have taken place over the last decade in digital radiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We as a professional must work cautiously and with the best interests of our patients in mind. [24] Recommendations Attention to detail, good communication, and excellent documentation can help reduce a teledentistry practitioner's medium-associated liability. E-mail sent to the practitioner by the patient in reference to his or her condition or treatment must be kept by the practitioner as part of the patient's medical record and that the content of such e-mails can be made a part of the discovery process in a potential legal proceeding.…”
Section: Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%