2016
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frederik Ruysch (1638–1731): Historical perspective and contemporary analysis of his teratological legacy

Abstract: The Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) in Saint Petersburg is the oldest museum in Russia. It keeps the remains of the anatomical collection of the world‐famous 17th century Dutch anatomist Frederik Ruysch. This unique collection was bought and shipped in 1717 by Czar Peter the Great, and presently still comprises more than 900 specimens, a modest number of which concerns specimens with congenital anomalies. We searched for teratological clues in the existing collection and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All inventoried existing teratological specimens were, when possible, assigned to a specific collector and were matched, where possible, to (historical) literate. As previously described (Boer, Radziun, & oostra, 2017) all specimens and descriptions were reduced to “unique cases.” Finally, the most remarkable specimens were selected for a detailed description (See case 1–11) and the most influential collectors were described in detail (See Sections 4 and 5). Due to the magnitude of the found specimens and matching with historical descriptions, it is beyond the borders and scope of this paper to include all matching results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All inventoried existing teratological specimens were, when possible, assigned to a specific collector and were matched, where possible, to (historical) literate. As previously described (Boer, Radziun, & oostra, 2017) all specimens and descriptions were reduced to “unique cases.” Finally, the most remarkable specimens were selected for a detailed description (See case 1–11) and the most influential collectors were described in detail (See Sections 4 and 5). Due to the magnitude of the found specimens and matching with historical descriptions, it is beyond the borders and scope of this paper to include all matching results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the anatomical specimens of Frederik Ruysch (1638Ruysch ( -1731 are on permanent display in the Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) in Saint Petersburg (Russia), the collection originated in The Netherlands during the late 17th and early 18th centuries (Boer, Radziun, & Oostra, 2017). Ruysch was a Dutch professor in anatomy and botany, who built up a collection of more than 2,000 specimens.…”
Section: The Collection Of Dutch Anatomist Frederik Ruyschmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these collections are paired with copperplate engravings and lithographic illustrations and comprehensive descriptions. In some cases, in which the actual specimen is lost, the descriptions and depictions are of such high quality and level of detail that a diagnosis could still be made centuries after they were collected (Boer, Radziun, & Oostra, 2017). In fact, many diagnoses could not be made if these depictions were absent-as more often than not-the depicted specimens do not exist anymore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this eponymous disease is named after a Danish physician Harald Hirschsprung, who described it in 1886, it was actually a Dutch anatomist and botanist, Frederik Ruysch, who first mentioned this condition in 1691 as “ enormis intestini coli dilatatio ” in a case report of a 5-year-old girl. Therefore, an eponym Ruysch disease was created, although it is rarely used, despite Ruysch´s description being almost 200 years older than Hirschsprung’s [ 31 ]. The understanding of HSCR etiopathogenesis was obscure until 1948.…”
Section: Etiopathogenesis Of Hirschsprung’s Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%