2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-access copy-number variant detection tools for targeted next-generation sequencing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the role of CNVs in local adaptation relative to SNPs in non-model species is poorly understood and remains mostly restricted to a very limited number of animal and plant species in terrestrial environments (Tigano et al, 2018;Rinker et al, 2019;Nelson et al, 2018, Prunier et al, 2019, making this issue still largely unexplored in marine species. CNVs are also rarely studied on a large subset of individuals due to financial and technical constraints because classical approaches to detect CNVs, such as paired-end mapping, split read, de novo assembly or depth of coverage, required a reference genome and whole-genome resequencing at deep coverage (Roca et al, 2019). However, recent technological and methodological improvements in sequences analyses hold promise to address such issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the role of CNVs in local adaptation relative to SNPs in non-model species is poorly understood and remains mostly restricted to a very limited number of animal and plant species in terrestrial environments (Tigano et al, 2018;Rinker et al, 2019;Nelson et al, 2018, Prunier et al, 2019, making this issue still largely unexplored in marine species. CNVs are also rarely studied on a large subset of individuals due to financial and technical constraints because classical approaches to detect CNVs, such as paired-end mapping, split read, de novo assembly or depth of coverage, required a reference genome and whole-genome resequencing at deep coverage (Roca et al, 2019). However, recent technological and methodological improvements in sequences analyses hold promise to address such issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNVs are estimated to cause approximately 10% of disorders, and they seem to be even more involved in neurological disorders than in many other disorder groups [104,105]. CNVs can be detected from various types of next generation sequencing (NGS) data, and numerous CNV detection algorithms have been developed during recent years [103,106]. Usually, different technical approaches are needed for WES and gene panel data compared to WGS data, since the former produce non-continuous sequencing data [107].…”
Section: The Identification Of Copy Number Variants From Hts Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CNV detection algorithms tend to have differing CNV detection accuracy and biases in detected CNV classes: therefore, utilizing more than one algorithm is generally recommended to achieve comprehensive CNV detection results [106,[109][110][111]. Kosugi and colleagues list CNV detection algorithms for WGS data with relatively best performances for each structural variation category, including CNVs [103].…”
Section: The Identification Of Copy Number Variants From Hts Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other benchmarks of CNV calling tools on targeted NGS panel data have been published. However, they were performed by the authors of the tools and executed against a single dataset (Johansson et al, 2016;Fowler et al, 2016;Povysil et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2017;Chiang et al, 2019), or used mainly simulated data with a small number of validated CNVs (Roca et al, 2019). The aim of this work is to perform an independent benchmark of multiple CNV calling tools, optimizing and evaluating them against multiple datasets generated in diagnostics settings, to identify the most suitable tools to be used for genetic diagnostics (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%