2006
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free DNA and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Serum Levels: An Important Combination for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Purpose:The identification of new molecular markers for the early detection of colorectal cancer has become an important objective.We compared the sensitivity and specificity of free circulating DNA with that of the more conventional carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and evaluated the two markers in combination. Experimental Design: The study was carried out on 75 healthy donors and 75 colorectal cancer patients. Free DNA was determined in serum with quantitative PCR analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of each assa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
72
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the levels are higher in mCRC patients than in healthy controls, as shown in Table 1 [15,20,47,58,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]; and the levels have some correlation to stage as reported in a limited number of studies [15,41,68,73] in primary CRC. These findings give important biological information, and researchers suggest that cfDNA has potential as a diagnostic or screening tool; a potential that is currently being investigated by several groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the levels are higher in mCRC patients than in healthy controls, as shown in Table 1 [15,20,47,58,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]; and the levels have some correlation to stage as reported in a limited number of studies [15,41,68,73] in primary CRC. These findings give important biological information, and researchers suggest that cfDNA has potential as a diagnostic or screening tool; a potential that is currently being investigated by several groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is therefore relevant to analyze the relation between cfDNA and CEA. As illustrated from the summary in Table 2, there is considerable variation in the measures, methods and parameter used to compare or combine the information from CEA and cfDNA analysis [15,20,32,33,39,41,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][81][82][83]. The table includes studies identified by a systematic literature search of circulating DNA in CRC (all stages) as illustrated by Supplementary Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2D shows the effect of 3 different concentrations of soluble CEA (sCEA) ranging from 0.2 to 5 mg/mL, with 5 mg/mL representing a level above that typically found in the serum of cancer patients with CEA positive tumors. 68,69 The concentrations of MEDI-565 for half-maximal lysis of target cells expressing CEA were 1.5 ng/mL for MEDI-565 alone, 4.0 ng/mL of MEDI-565 for 0.2 mg/mL of sCEA, 1.3 ng/ mL of MEDI-565 for 1.0 mg/mL of sCEA and 2.1 ng/mL of MEDI-565 for 5.0 mg/mL of sCEA (Fig. 2D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sCEA competitively inhibited binding of MEDI-565 to surface CEA, MEDI-565 was still able to kill tumor cells in vitro in a manner that was insensitive to soluble CEA at concentrations (5 mg/mL) that are above those typically found in the plasma of cancer patients, 68,69 and in vivo in animals bearing human tumors expressing and shedding CEA. This suggests that CEA shed into the blood of cancer patients or into the local tumor microenvironment may not represent a significant pharmacological sink that would negatively affect the activity of MEDI-565.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In 1977, Leon et al (12) reported increased levels of serum DNA in cancer patients compared with healthy controls. This was followed by other studies showing elevated levels of circulating serum or plasma DNA in patients with malignant tumors compared with benign controls (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Sozzi et al (17) examined plasma fcDNA levels as a marker for lung cancer and found that the median fcDNA levels in plasma were 8 times greater in cancer than that in control samples (area under the curve, 0.94).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%