1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.70.3752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free energies of generalized stacking faults in Si and implications for the brittle-ductile transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
81
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Kaxiras and Duesbery [36] have reported similar calculations done by DFT-LDA, for shearing of Si along (111) planes. They studied both unrelaxed and relaxed configurations, in the sense of block-like lattice motions as in Fig.…”
Section: Results For Si From Density Functional Theorymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recently, Kaxiras and Duesbery [36] have reported similar calculations done by DFT-LDA, for shearing of Si along (111) planes. They studied both unrelaxed and relaxed configurations, in the sense of block-like lattice motions as in Fig.…”
Section: Results For Si From Density Functional Theorymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the likelihood of their occurrence varies rather differently with the change of the sample or conditions. It resembles the brittle-ductile mode change in 3D solids, with silicon crystal as an example well explained from first principles (24). The goal of this article is to determine which of these mechanisms apply to the experimental conditions of tensile tests at ambient temperatures, a duration of seconds (instead of picoseconds as in generic MD run) and a CNT length Ͼ1 m. Although some trends could be revealed in our early work (25) and especially in the detailed analysis of classical potential-based MD simulations (26), the force field used there tends to underestimate the activation barriers (15), while it is shown (27) to overestimate the forces at large strain, which essentially excludes possibility of brittle mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The energy elevation is quite small, only~6.4 meV/atom, in line with previous theoretical calculations. 33,34 The small energy difference can be understood from the bonding configuration, that is, the number of tetrahedral bonds per atom remains unchanged. By performing quantum chemistry bonding analysis using the crystal orbital overlap population (COOP) 29,35 method, we have quantified the bonding contributions (blue curves in Figure 4).…”
Section: Hrtem Characterization Of the Cat Processmentioning
confidence: 99%