2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free energy calculations on dimer stability of the HIV protease using molecular dynamics and a continuum solvent model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
255
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
255
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…19 The calculations of Paulsen and Ornstein show that R ≈ 0.5 and ≈1.043 are the best values to use to correlate the calculated binding free energies with the respective experimental values. 20 In Wang's work, R ≈ 0.5 and ≈ 1.0 can give the best predicted binding affinities to a group of avidin ligands using the AMBER force field. 21 Jones-Herzog and Jorgensen observed that the addition of another term concerned with molecular solvent-accessible surfaces as well as R ) 0.131 and ) 0.131 could produce the best correlation.…”
Section: Mm/pbsa Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 The calculations of Paulsen and Ornstein show that R ≈ 0.5 and ≈1.043 are the best values to use to correlate the calculated binding free energies with the respective experimental values. 20 In Wang's work, R ≈ 0.5 and ≈ 1.0 can give the best predicted binding affinities to a group of avidin ligands using the AMBER force field. 21 Jones-Herzog and Jorgensen observed that the addition of another term concerned with molecular solvent-accessible surfaces as well as R ) 0.131 and ) 0.131 could produce the best correlation.…”
Section: Mm/pbsa Modelsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In the LIE approach proposed by Åqvist, ∆G b can be computed from ligand interaction energies in the bound and free states. On the basis of the linear response consideration, only averages of the interaction energies between the ligand and its surroundings need to be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al recently studied HIV protease dimerization using MM-PBSA [76]. They firstly calculated the binding free energies between the wild-type HIV protease with the two catalytic aspartic acid residues at different protonation states.…”
Section: Protein-protein Protein-peptide Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to for what systems MM-PBSA/GBSA tend to work well and for what systems not, in general, for systems that have substantial contributions to the free energy from buried charges, MM-PBSA/GBSA may not perform well; on the other hand, good results can be expected for the hydrophobic interaction dominated systems. Yet, this is not always the case and good results of both relative and absolute free energies could be observed for almost all kinds of systems, including proteins [14,44], nucleic acids [50][51], protein-ligand [13,54,63], and protein-protein [76][77][78][79]. It is emphasized that the above summary may be biased to some degree since we only selected some representative papers published recently in this field.…”
Section: E Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding free energies were computed using the Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) method [10,11]. In addition, we present an optimized protocol using the Autodock program based on cross-docking of the five inhibitors to the binding site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%