1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.14380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-energy derivatives and structure optimization within quasiharmonic lattice dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, it is also possible to account for thermal effects on the structure of each configuration by performing a free energy minimization at each geometry and temperature, using the quasi-harmonic approximation (e.g. Taylor et al, 1997;Gale, 1998;Grau-Crespo et al, 2002). However, considering the large number of configurations treated here and the high computational cost of free energy minimizations, we have optimized the structures only with respect to the lattice energy.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Energies and Free Energies And Geometry Predicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, it is also possible to account for thermal effects on the structure of each configuration by performing a free energy minimization at each geometry and temperature, using the quasi-harmonic approximation (e.g. Taylor et al, 1997;Gale, 1998;Grau-Crespo et al, 2002). However, considering the large number of configurations treated here and the high computational cost of free energy minimizations, we have optimized the structures only with respect to the lattice energy.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Energies and Free Energies And Geometry Predicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods have recently been developed to fully minimize G (x; p, T ) with respect to x within the quasiharmonic approximation when simple pair potentials are used in the crystal simulation [2]. However, when a firstprinciples method is used, the full minimization of G (x; p, T ) is currently infeasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the third term, A vib , is the vibrational Helmholtz free energy, which includes both the vibrational contribution to the internal energy and the −T S constant temperature condition term (since we are considering a perfect crystal whose only internal degrees of freedom are vibrations, S = S vib ). The rigorous statistical calculation of A vib requires knowledge of the exact vibrational levels, but it is customary to introduce the quasi-harmonic approximation [1], (2) A vib (x; T ) = ∞ 0 1 2h ω + kT ln(1 − e −hω/ kT ) g(x; ω) dω, where g(x; ω) is the phonon or vibrational density of states. The term quasi-harmonic, as different from the rigid harmonic approximation, remarks that the density of states is allowed to vary with the crystal configuration, thus including anharmonic contributions to a certain extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the static limit, the structure is determined by the condition EaX i 0Y where E is the static contribution to the internal energy, and the X i are the variables that define the structure. These are the three lattice vectors, the atomic positions in the unit cell and, in the case of the shell model, the shell displacements (Taylor et al 1997). The most convenient approach to vacancy and other defect energies is the two-region approach introduced by Lidiard & Norgett (1972) and described in full by Catlow & Mackrodt (1982).…”
Section: Displacement Energy E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%