1989
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.002243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free Energy Via Molecular Simulation: Applications to Chemical and Biomolecular Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
850
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,071 publications
(857 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(187 reference statements)
6
850
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, however, one is interested in free energy differences ∆F mn , which are somewhat easier to obtain than F m and F n themselves. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] I.3. Calculation of ∆F mn by the Counting Method and Thermodynamic Integration.…”
Section: I1 the Role Of Free Energy In Structural Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, however, one is interested in free energy differences ∆F mn , which are somewhat easier to obtain than F m and F n themselves. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] I.3. Calculation of ∆F mn by the Counting Method and Thermodynamic Integration.…”
Section: I1 the Role Of Free Energy In Structural Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free energy perturbation (FEP) 30,40 can be performed to evaluate free energy change caused by a small structural change. The FEP method, in combination with MD simulation, has been used to study protein-ligand interaction [41][42][43] and protein stability.…”
Section: Free Energy Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a strong interest in S as a measure of order and as an essential ingredient of the free energy, F=E−TS, where T is the absolute temperature; F constitutes the criterion of stability, which is mandatory in structure determination of proteins, for example. Furthermore, because MC simulations constitute models for dynamical processes, one would seek to calculate changes in F and S during a relaxation process, by assuming local equilibrium in certain parts along the MC trajectory; a classic example is simulation of protein folding [11].S, and F are commonly calculated by thermodynamic integration (TI) techniques [12][13][14] that do not operate on a given MC sample but requires conducting a separate set of MC simulations. This is a robust approach that enables one to calculate differences, ΔS ab and ΔF ab , between two states a and b of a system; however, if the structural variance of such states is large (e.g., helical and hairpin states of a polypeptide) the integration from state a to b becomes difficult *Corresponding author…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S, and F are commonly calculated by thermodynamic integration (TI) techniques [12][13][14] that do not operate on a given MC sample but requires conducting a separate set of MC simulations. This is a robust approach that enables one to calculate differences, ΔS ab and ΔF ab , between two states a and b of a system; however, if the structural variance of such states is large (e.g., helical and hairpin states of a polypeptide) the integration from state a to b becomes difficult and in many cases unfeasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%