Health Systems Governance in Europe 2010
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511750496.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free movement of services in the EU and health care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Directive tries to address these uncertainties and represents a valuable attempt to preserve the governance role of each country's health authorities in the context of the potentially deregulatory dynamic provoked by the free movement principles of the EU Treaty. 9 The Directive may increase legal certainty and transparency on benefit packages, tariffs and reimbursement levels and may push authorities to address weaknesses in the domestic systems, particularly regarding waiting times. It may, however, also require the benefit package to be revised or adapting the payment system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Directive tries to address these uncertainties and represents a valuable attempt to preserve the governance role of each country's health authorities in the context of the potentially deregulatory dynamic provoked by the free movement principles of the EU Treaty. 9 The Directive may increase legal certainty and transparency on benefit packages, tariffs and reimbursement levels and may push authorities to address weaknesses in the domestic systems, particularly regarding waiting times. It may, however, also require the benefit package to be revised or adapting the payment system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Directive tries to address these uncertainties and represents a valuable attempt to preserve the governance role of each country’s health authorities in the context of the potentially deregulatory dynamic provoked by the free movement principles of the EU Treaty. 9…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Court, in its legal reasoning in Watts, focussed exclusively on the cross-border dimension of the transaction, that is, on the fact that a patient pays a health care provider directly in another Member State and is then reimbursed by the system of affiliation. 90 With this focus on the private transaction, the Court concluded that there was no need in the case of Watts 'to determine whether the provision of hospital treatment in the context of a national health service such as the NHS is in itself a service within the meaning of those provisions'. 91 Reviewing that decision, Spaventa accused the Court of performing a 'hermeneutic "trick"'.…”
Section: And Implementingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 This meant that the proposed act reflects a relatively consensual and unitary problem perception that links a lack of service liberalization to the need for further market-making. Where debated, healthcare followed this line, discussing socio-economic implications and focusing private healthcare providers (COM80:125–129; Gerkiere et al., 2010: 500–501). At the same time ingredients of an integrated policy solution – such as the quality of services or issues of consumer trust in services – remained under-explored (Hartlapp et al., 2014: 104–107).…”
Section: Eu Trans-border Healthcare Policymentioning
confidence: 99%