2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free surface impact on radiation damage in pure nickel by in-situ self-ion irradiation: can it be avoided?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed defect free layer can not only be explained by an increase of defect recombination due to a higher damage rate at the damage peak (2.7 x10 -4 dpa/s). Indeed, past experiment realized with the same damage rate shows that vacancy loops grow at this level of flux [19]. Therefore, the observed defect free layer is related to the implantation peak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The observed defect free layer can not only be explained by an increase of defect recombination due to a higher damage rate at the damage peak (2.7 x10 -4 dpa/s). Indeed, past experiment realized with the same damage rate shows that vacancy loops grow at this level of flux [19]. Therefore, the observed defect free layer is related to the implantation peak.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Nevertheless, recently, vacancy-type loops were identified for the first time as dominant in the microstructure, within the damage zones of Ni irradiated by self-ions at 450°C [18]. The same vacancy nature was identified in as-irradiated TEM thin foils [19] and Focus Ion Beam (FIB) specimens up to 1.5 µm irradiation depth [18]. Interstitial Frank loops were only occasionally detected within vacancy-type Frank loops eradicating the outer vacancy loop [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations