2018
DOI: 10.3390/jmse6030105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free Surface Reconstruction for Phase Accurate Irregular Wave Generation

Abstract: The experimental wave paddle signal is unknown to the numerical modellers in many cases. This makes it quite challenging to numerically reproduce the time history of free surface elevation for irregular waves. In the present work, a numerical investigation is performed using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based model to validate and investigate a non-iterative free surface reconstruction technique for irregular waves. In the current approach, the free surface is reconstructed by spectrally composing the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase‐resolved numerical wave tank REEF3D (Bihs et al, 2016)—verified with field measurements—offers spatiotemporal distributions of oscillatory flow velocities and other relevant hydraulic variables in the near‐bank area. Three short sections of different intensities were simulated based on field measurements of an actual wave event using the wave reconstruction method (Aggarwal et al, 2018), resulting in phase accurate irregular wave hydrodynamics. Although wave heights during the analyzed sections ( H rms = 2.2–9.3 cm) covered the usually observable range of magnitudes for this section of the Danube (Fleit et al, 2016, 2019), the waves are considered relatively mild compared to 60 cm high ship‐induced waves measured on the Austrian Danube (Liedermann et al, 2014) or the Mississippi River (Bhowmik, Soong, Reichelt, & Seddik, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phase‐resolved numerical wave tank REEF3D (Bihs et al, 2016)—verified with field measurements—offers spatiotemporal distributions of oscillatory flow velocities and other relevant hydraulic variables in the near‐bank area. Three short sections of different intensities were simulated based on field measurements of an actual wave event using the wave reconstruction method (Aggarwal et al, 2018), resulting in phase accurate irregular wave hydrodynamics. Although wave heights during the analyzed sections ( H rms = 2.2–9.3 cm) covered the usually observable range of magnitudes for this section of the Danube (Fleit et al, 2016, 2019), the waves are considered relatively mild compared to 60 cm high ship‐induced waves measured on the Austrian Danube (Liedermann et al, 2014) or the Mississippi River (Bhowmik, Soong, Reichelt, & Seddik, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present simulations, a flatbed wave generation zone was located in the first section of the computational domain. The end of this initial zone was the location of the pressure sensor; thus, wave generation could be adjusted to the field data using the wave reconstruction method (Aggarwal, Pákozdi, Bihs, Myrhaug, & Alagan Chella, 2018). The measured (calculated) surface elevation time series were decomposed via FFT, from which the irregular wave train could be reconstructed at the inlet boundary through superposing each individual linear wave component ( N ) based on their amplitude, angular frequency, and phase, according to linear wave theory: ηz,tx=0=i=1NAicos()εiωit uz,tx=0=I=1NAiωicosh()ki()z+dsinh()kidcos()εiωit wz,tx=0=I=1NAiωisinh()ki()z+dsinh()kidsin()εiωit where A i is the amplitude, k i is the wave number, ω i is the angular frequency, d is the total water depth, z is the signed distance of the point of interest from the mean free surface, and ε i is the phase of each ( i = 1…N ) wave components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the authors believe that boundary conditions for the wave generation could be further improved to take account for the already emphasized transient nature of the wave events. This could be either done through directly reproducing the measured wave events with the so‐called wave reconstruction method (see Aggarwal, Cs, Bihs, Myrhaug, & Chella, ) or through using spectrograms as inlet boundary conditions. The validated model offers a numerical wave tank providing the detailed spatial distribution of relevant hydrodynamic variables, such as the flow velocities or the turbulent kinetic energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c. The waves at a distance of -28 m from the wavemaker in the 2D NWT are reconstructed in the 3D NWT at x = -28 m (beginning of the 3D NWT) using the free surface reconstruction technique (Aggarwal et al, 2018b). The reconstructed waves in the 3D NWT are then identical to the waves in the 2D NWT.…”
Section: Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%