2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freedom restriction and non-member customers’ response to loyalty programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis of a loyalty program is to provide products and services above standards to offer social status and recognition to different customer groups. These efforts enable the retention of loyal and profitable customers (Ding et al, 2021). Nowadays, however, efforts to acquire new customers have gone beyond retaining current customers, so that new customers can buy a product or service at relatively more advantageous prices and with more opportunities than current customers.…”
Section: Customer Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of a loyalty program is to provide products and services above standards to offer social status and recognition to different customer groups. These efforts enable the retention of loyal and profitable customers (Ding et al, 2021). Nowadays, however, efforts to acquire new customers have gone beyond retaining current customers, so that new customers can buy a product or service at relatively more advantageous prices and with more opportunities than current customers.…”
Section: Customer Loyaltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between epidemics, such as SARS, Influenza, Ebola, and Swine Flu, has been extensively studied in the literature (Akhtar et al, 2020 ), demonstrating the relevance of PRT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary components of the PRT include the consumers' freedom restriction resulting in anger and negative cognitions (Ding et al, 2021 ), which provides a foundation for investigating the restaurant consumers' reactions to psychological distance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior literature (Rosenberg and Siegel, 2018 ; Hoang, 2020 ; Lee et al, 2020 ; de Rosa and Mannarini, 2021 ; Fischetti et al, 2021 ; Foroudi et al, 2021 ) also lends support to the application of this theory in the current study.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals thus seek to maintain or reestablish their freedom through means such as adopting the opposite of the messages’ advocacy (Worchel & Brehm, 1970), or perceiving the alternative option to be more attractive (Hammock & Brehm, 1966). Psychological reactance theory has received recent attention in the fields of advertising (e.g., Kim et al, 2017), prosocial behaviors (e.g., Kavvouris et al, 2020), health communications (Amstrong et al, 2019), tourism (e.g., Lunardo & Ponsignon, 2020; Song et al, 2018) and hospitality (Ding et al, 2021). In the streams of studies, reactance has been treated as a composite measurement that is intertwined with negative cognitions like counterarguments and strong effects like anger (Dillard & Shen, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%