2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-005x.2011.00272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freedom to surf: the positive effects of workplace Internet leisure browsing

Abstract: It is commonly believed that for workers to browse the Internet for personal reasons during work hours is non-productive. Contesting this belief, this study documents positive effects of workplace Internet leisure browsing (WILB) on employee productivity. It is argued that WILB is an unobtrusive interruption which enables restoration of mental capacity and fosters feelings of autonomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
80
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The project plans to implement a dedicated social media strategy to increase student enrolments, maintain student engagement, and facilitate donor and partner interest. Coker (2011) argues that granting freedom to browse provides employees with an opportunity to refresh and revitalise their thoughts, and the feeling that they have a certain amount of freedom or independence in the workplace. Internationally, several universities and organizations have successfully integrated social media, in marketing and communications (Murphy, 2012) and increasingly students are using University social media pages as a community forum (Macquarie University, 2012).…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project plans to implement a dedicated social media strategy to increase student enrolments, maintain student engagement, and facilitate donor and partner interest. Coker (2011) argues that granting freedom to browse provides employees with an opportunity to refresh and revitalise their thoughts, and the feeling that they have a certain amount of freedom or independence in the workplace. Internationally, several universities and organizations have successfully integrated social media, in marketing and communications (Murphy, 2012) and increasingly students are using University social media pages as a community forum (Macquarie University, 2012).…”
Section: Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyberloafing activities were modified from the questionnaire developed by Coker (2011). There were 20 types of cyberloafing activities that had been adapted to the context of this study, such as reading online news, reading/checking social network websites (including Twitter and Facebook), watching video online (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, cyberloafing for personal purposes is claimed to have negative consequences for company's and employees' productivity (Griffiths, 2010); however, cyberloafing within a moderate amount can give considerable advantage (Coker, 2011). Hence, the objective of this study is to analyze whether Gen Y, X, and Baby Boomers have the same motivation for cyberloafing in the workplace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers Belanger and Van Slyke, 2002;Block, 2001;Greenfield and Davis, 2002;Oravec, 2002;Stanton, 2002) argue that cyberloafing harms employers while others (Blanchard and Henle 2008;Case and Young, 2002;Coker, 2011;Coker, 2013;Greenfield and Davis, 2002;Lim, 2002;Malachowski, 2005;Mills et al, 2001) view that it enhances employee productivity. In this study, out of 20, 14 respondents rationalized that cyberloafing is beneficial for the secretaries of MWU whereas 6 respondents denied it.…”
Section: Rationalizing Cyberloafingmentioning
confidence: 99%