2013
DOI: 10.1656/045.020.0309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freeze-Drying to Preserve Birds for Teaching Collections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wing in the defined load shape was preserved following a freeze-drying method utilized to preserve specimens for teaching collections (see Shoffner in 2013) [ 15 ]. Our freeze dryer consists of a refrigerated specimen chamber, a refrigerated condenser and a vacuum pump.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wing in the defined load shape was preserved following a freeze-drying method utilized to preserve specimens for teaching collections (see Shoffner in 2013) [ 15 ]. Our freeze dryer consists of a refrigerated specimen chamber, a refrigerated condenser and a vacuum pump.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter was defined after the freeze-drying method was applied to 5 bird wings where all of them showed the percentage of mass loss aforementioned. The qualitative consideration is that the texture of the specimen must be seen as dry, thin and brittle [ 15 ]. For the present study a benchtop freeze-dryer was used (Labconco FreeZone ® , Kansas City, MO, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Nurnadia et al . ), 27% for reptiles (Vitt ), 41% for birds (Shoffner & Brittingham ) and 32% for mammals (Baker et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wet weight of vertebrate prey (for small mammals based on data of their weight collected in the Mammal Research Institute and other vertebrates from literature sources) was converted to dry mass by multiplying by the estimated percentage dry mass. This was taken as 25% for fish (Ali et al 2006, Nurnadia et al 2011, 27% for reptiles (Vitt 1978), 41% for birds (Shoffner & Brittingham 2013) and 32% for mammals (Baker et al 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%