2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2008)20:1(78)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freeze–Thaw Resistance of Lightweight Concrete and Aggregate at Different Freezing Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, when using a pre-dry aggregate and tighter matrix (w/c = 0.37), no signs of damage or decrease in strength were observed, not only after 150 cycles, but also after 200 cycles. The results proved the observation made in [27,32], that the application of an initially dry aggregate may lead to a comparable or much better frost resistance of lightweight concretes compared to ordinary concretes of a similar volume composition.…”
Section: Freeze-thaw Resistancesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, when using a pre-dry aggregate and tighter matrix (w/c = 0.37), no signs of damage or decrease in strength were observed, not only after 150 cycles, but also after 200 cycles. The results proved the observation made in [27,32], that the application of an initially dry aggregate may lead to a comparable or much better frost resistance of lightweight concretes compared to ordinary concretes of a similar volume composition.…”
Section: Freeze-thaw Resistancesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This has also been confirmed by assessments of the state of concrete in existing structures exposed to cyclic freezing and thawing [ 30 , 31 ]. Moreover, it was proven in [ 27 , 32 ] that, by using dry aggregate, it is possible to achieve a comparable or much better frost resistance of lightweight concretes compared to ordinary concretes, even in the case of concretes having the same volume composition. By replacing the normal-weight aggregate, in part or even in entirety, with several types of LWA (Leca 670, Leca 800, Liapor 8), it is possible to improve the frost resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the remaining mass of RPA blocks follows a linear reduction path, the remaining mass after 50 cycles is extrapolated to be 99.1%, which satisfies the weathering criteria (less than 1.0% per 50 cycles) for paving units (Table 1) [32]. The durability of RPA blocks is therefore adequate and at least comparable with those of lightweight aggregate and lightweight concrete involving recycled plastic-waste aggregate (Figure 5) [40,41]. Previous freeze-thaw studies of conventional and permeable pavers found that rubberized pervious concrete sustains a mass loss of 3.5% over 240 cycles, and plane concrete and clay-soil blocks sustain mass losses of 34.0% over 300 cycles and 0.7% over 28 cycles, respectively (Table 2) [42,43].…”
Section: Performance Summary and Economic Feasiblity Of Rpa Blockmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is well-known that aggregates with a lower porosity and a greater proportion of fine pores possess better frost resistance. 37 The results of the tests that were performed in order to determine the frost resistance of the investigated aggregate indicated a significant loss of mass upon freezing ( Table 7), which was especially severe in the case of the granulated aggregate (GT1), where the loss of mass amounted to 96.7 %. The very high loss of mass (96.7 %) on freezing of the granulated fly ash aggregates could be ascribed to the very high porosity (water absorption of 57.8 %) and the very low crushing strength (0.96 MPa).…”
Section: Determination and Optimization Of Aggregate Frost Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%