2020
DOI: 10.1162/dram_a_00916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fremdes Erbe: Nelisiwe Xaba and German Dance Heritage

Abstract: Nelisiwe Xaba’s Fremde Tänze opens up questions of contemporary implications of dance history. Situated within the cultural politics of dance in Germany, especially funding programs such as Tanzfonds Erbe (dance funds heritage), Xaba’s work and the curatorial frame of the Julius-Hans-Spiegel-Zentrum project contest the notion of “cultural heritage” from a postcolonial perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New modernist studies constitute a methodological framework for approaching modernism that was initiated in the field of literature, notably through Douglas Mao and Rebecca Walkowitz's 2008 article, “The New Modernist Studies.” Mao and Walkowitz (2008, 737–738) urged a move toward a “spatial” expansion of the analysis of modernism, to avoid its Western/European bias; and a “vertical” expansion opening toward the modernity enacted by groups excluded from the canon. This is consistent with dance studies’ increasing focus on hitherto unacknowledged practices, agents, and contexts (e.g., Wittrock 2020, 2021; Haitzinger 2020). It is also consistent with the field's ongoing interrogations of the binary and hierarchy of center/periphery, for instance through the notion of decentering (e.g., Collective 2021).…”
Section: Context Framework and Directionssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…New modernist studies constitute a methodological framework for approaching modernism that was initiated in the field of literature, notably through Douglas Mao and Rebecca Walkowitz's 2008 article, “The New Modernist Studies.” Mao and Walkowitz (2008, 737–738) urged a move toward a “spatial” expansion of the analysis of modernism, to avoid its Western/European bias; and a “vertical” expansion opening toward the modernity enacted by groups excluded from the canon. This is consistent with dance studies’ increasing focus on hitherto unacknowledged practices, agents, and contexts (e.g., Wittrock 2020, 2021; Haitzinger 2020). It is also consistent with the field's ongoing interrogations of the binary and hierarchy of center/periphery, for instance through the notion of decentering (e.g., Collective 2021).…”
Section: Context Framework and Directionssupporting
confidence: 77%