French attempts to eradicate non-indigenous mammals and their consequences for native biota

Abstract

Many European politicians, managers, and scientists believe that non-indigenous species cannot be eradicated and that attempts to do so are hazardous because of frequent undesirable results. This notion seems to be based on the view that successful eradications undertaken in many other parts of the world cannot be generalised. To allow reasoned consideration of this argument, the eradication of non-indigenous vertebrate species performed in the French territories (European and overseas) and their recorded consequences on native fauna and flora are synthesised. Nineteen vertebrate eradication attempts were recorded, with seven mammal species as the targets. Of these attempts four failed for technical reasons and one for reasons undetermined as yet. These operations took place on islands of four biogeographical areas (West-European, Mediterranean, West Indies and Indian Ocean subantarctic) except a continental one (West-European continent). Among these 19 attempts, 13 were conducted according to a global strategy that provided data on the impact of the disappearance of the non-indigenous species on several native species. This impact, never detrimental, was determined for 14 species (one mammal, nine birds, one marine turtle, one crab, one beetle, one plant). Unexpected consequences of the disappearance of the invader were recorded for four native species (29%). This result highlights the poverty of natural historical information for several taxa and the flimsiness of the empty niche concept that is often used to argue for the delay of or to prevent any action again a non-indigenous species. If French territories can be taken as an example, eradications of non-indigenous species are not impossible; a good risk assessment prevents undesirable long-term consequences for native species and several native species benefited from the disappearance of the invader. Furthermore, eradication constitutes a powerful experimental tool for ecology and natural history studies if conceived as both a management and research operation.

River management and habitat characteristics of three sympatric aquatic rodents: common muskrat, coypu and European beaver

“…Identifying species' requirements is a critical ingredient to developing sound management and conservation plans Lorvelec and Pascal 2005;Parker 2008). Ecological niches are defined by the relationships between organisms and the physical and biological environments, taking into account both time and space (Shea and Chesson 2002).…”

Eradications of invasive mammals from islands: why, where, how and what next?

“…There is sufficient information available that with good planning and advice from an eradication expert, campaigns to eliminate invasive mammals from small islands (<500 ha) can be achieved with relatively modest budgets and small teams (5-10 people). It is important to caution that despite many recent successes, the effort needed to eradicate introduced mammals should not be underestimated, as indicated by the failure of several well-resourced programmes for a variety of reasons, including inadequate baiting regimes, competition for bait from terrestrial invertebrates, deviation from agreed protocols, problems with nontarget poisoning leading to cancellation, lack of funding and public support (Lorvelec and Pascal 2005;Howald et al 2007). Nevertheless, by widening awareness of the available technology and expertise, learning lessons from past campaigns, and considering ecosystemwide implications, both the political will and opportunities for eradications and the associated research are currently unprecedented.…”

Invasive rodents on islands: integrating historical and contemporary ecology

“…Understanding these broader, often indirect ecological effects is a critical precursor to successful restoration of insular ecosystems following rodent eradication (Zavaleta et al 2001;Lorvelec and Pascal 2005;Courchamp et al 2003;Caut et al 2007Caut et al , 2008a. For example, Caut et al (2008b) demonstrate how undesirable side effects of eradication (e.g.…”