2015
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and characteristics of goal attainment following BoNT-A injection for management of spasticity

Abstract: Although active goals are commonly identified by people with spasticity, passive goals were more likely to be achieved following BoNT-A injection. A long duration of spasticity does not preclude patients from achieving mobility and transfer goals. Non-stroke participants were more likely to achieve mobility and transfer goals. Implications for Rehabilitation Patients with chronic spasticity should be considered for BoNT-A as clinically meaningful outcomes can be achieved. When spasticity is present in multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A single muscle is rarely treated in isolation; the spastic pattern and the spastic muscles responsible for it must be clearly understood by the evaluating clinician to ensure appropriate muscle targeting for BoNT-A injection. The GAS can be used to guide clinicians in deciding which muscles are a priority for injection and ensure the muscles selected are related to the goal, helping to keep the decision goal-focused and patient-focused [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single muscle is rarely treated in isolation; the spastic pattern and the spastic muscles responsible for it must be clearly understood by the evaluating clinician to ensure appropriate muscle targeting for BoNT-A injection. The GAS can be used to guide clinicians in deciding which muscles are a priority for injection and ensure the muscles selected are related to the goal, helping to keep the decision goal-focused and patient-focused [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many patients with FD have a propensity towards falls and suffering adverse consequences such as fracture [2]. We have also calculated the lower limb parameters of the UPDRS scale and patient reported goals i.e., GAS goals which are increasingly considered important outcomes in rehabilitation research [13]. We found a significant reduction in pain besides the reduction in dystonia and improvement of other lower limb functional parameters with BT injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Secondary outcomes include changes inSpasticity measured by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)2 Min Walk Test [18]Berg Balance Score [19]Timed Up and Go (TUG) [20]Lower limb function by ABILICO [21]Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) [22]Quality of life by SF 12 (Rand version)ADL score -The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF) [23]Passive range of motion at the ankle joint.Use of ActivPAL to quantify ambulatory activities at home [25]…”
Section: Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of this study is to investigate the primary outcome of gait velocity by Gait Rite (Electronic Walkway) and the secondary outcomes are measuring spasticity by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), walking by 2 Min Walk Test [18]; balance by Berg Balance Scale [19]; mobility by Timed Up and Go (TUG) [20]; lower limb function by ABILICO [21]; patient related goal by Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) [22]; QOL by SF 12 (Rand version); activities of daily living by the Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF) [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%