2001
DOI: 10.1007/s100380170027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and clinical features of patients with sensorineural hearing loss associated with the A3243G mutation of the mitochondrial DNA in otorhinolaryngic clinics

Abstract: The A3243G mutation of the mitochondrial gene is a cause of maternally inherited diabetes and deafness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and clinical features of this mutation in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in otorhinolaryngic clinics. The frequency of the A3243G mutation in 230 patients with SNHL was 1.74% (4/230). Three of the four patients had diabetes mellitus (DM) and were already aware that they had the mutation. The other had cardiomyopathy but not DM, and proved t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have tested at the same time for another mtDNA mutation, A3243G, in the tRNA Leu gene, which has been reported to be associated also with sensorineural deafness in significant prevalence, especially in syndromic cases with DM Nagata et al 2001). However, this mutation was not found in the total of 125 sensorineural deafness patients (groups I and II) examined or in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have tested at the same time for another mtDNA mutation, A3243G, in the tRNA Leu gene, which has been reported to be associated also with sensorineural deafness in significant prevalence, especially in syndromic cases with DM Nagata et al 2001). However, this mutation was not found in the total of 125 sensorineural deafness patients (groups I and II) examined or in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A3243G mutation was detected by a similar PCR-RFLP procedure, involving the amplification of a 903-bp fragment of the mtDNA with the primer pair L2826 and H3728, and the detection of the mutation as a gain of an ApaI restriction site (Lertrit et al 1992) (Lee et al 1997). The prevalence of this mutation in sensorineural deafness patients in Japan is 1.7% (Nagata et al 2001), and as high as 50-60% of diabetic patients with sensorineural deafness Nagata et al 2001). Thus, it seems that there is an ethnic-related variation in the prevalence of this mutation, presumably influenced by the overall mitochondrial genetic background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports suggest that patients with sensorineural hearing loss due to the A3243G mutation have onset hearing impairment from the 20s to the 50s (Chinnery et al, 2000a;Nagata et al, 2001). The youngest patients (386-204, 386-205, 386-206) in the present study had a normal hearing test at 19, 15, and 14 years of age, respectively, and were not analyzed for the A3243G mutation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This suggests that individuals with the 3243A > G mtDNA mutation could be markedly under-recognized. The frequency of the A3243G mutation was 0.5% and 1.7% in the United Kingdom and Japanese patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL), respectively (Hutchin et al, 2001;Nagata et al, 2001). Only 0.1% of Iranian NSHL patients harbored the 3243A > G mutation (Montazer Zohour et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of A3243G mutation has been investigated in different countries with different study design. Eight studies have previously screened patients with sensoneural hearing loss, epilepsy, juvenile stroke syndromes, myopathy and ataxia for the A3243G mtDNA substitution and revealed this mutation in 0.07% to 6.5% of their patients [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The highest frequency has been observed in the Finnish population where the prevalence was calculated to be 16.3:100.000 in the adult population of the investigated area [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%