2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and magnitude of debris flows on Cheekye River, British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of common debris-flow sizes and transport characteristics in the transit zone are of paramount importance for the design of torrent control, a realistic assessment of volumes deposited, or the delineation of hazard zones. While this study emphasizes that a coupling of tree-ring records with field surveys can be used to draw a very detailed envelope for the debris-flow activity of the recent past and allows for climate control, data clearly lack higher predictive power for the identification of rare and very rare events with return periods of 10 3 or 10 4 years, such as recently illustrated by Jakob and Friele (2010). Another possible limitation of the approach lies in the fact that (i) more recent events may overprint or erode evidence of former activity; (ii) small events may stall inside the channel without leaving deposits on the cone, and that (iii) the rare, but large events of 1922, 1948, and 1993 may have reset the debris-flow system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Identification of common debris-flow sizes and transport characteristics in the transit zone are of paramount importance for the design of torrent control, a realistic assessment of volumes deposited, or the delineation of hazard zones. While this study emphasizes that a coupling of tree-ring records with field surveys can be used to draw a very detailed envelope for the debris-flow activity of the recent past and allows for climate control, data clearly lack higher predictive power for the identification of rare and very rare events with return periods of 10 3 or 10 4 years, such as recently illustrated by Jakob and Friele (2010). Another possible limitation of the approach lies in the fact that (i) more recent events may overprint or erode evidence of former activity; (ii) small events may stall inside the channel without leaving deposits on the cone, and that (iii) the rare, but large events of 1922, 1948, and 1993 may have reset the debris-flow system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Accordingly, the risk has increased dramatically and once debris flows occurred, the consequence is usually disastrous. So, it is worth noting that the areas susceptible to debris flows and related flooding with low frequency but large magnitude should be assessed scientifically (Wang 2005;Jakob and Friele 2010) and the hazard regions should be zoned exactly. What is more, comprehensive measures including both engineering measures and also non-engineering measures should be adopted for risk management and hazard mitigation.…”
Section: Depositional Characteristics and River Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, integral risk management, requires fundamental knowledge of the expected natural hazardous processes, and their spatial extent and intensities. The estimation of flow parameters like discharge, flow velocity or flow height are considered to be essential (Guzzetti 2000;Lin et al 2002;Glade and Crozier 2005;Fuchs et al 2008;Jakob and Friele 2010). Estimates of debris-flow characteristics are often based on post-event field investigations, and may be related to a certain cross section in the channelized transit zone of a torrent channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%