1976
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.2.4.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and recency in cued recall: Interaction of old and new learning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that the answer is that the existing analyses of these data support dual processes or dual factors but do not discriminate between independence and dependence. For example, assume that recollection is completely dependent on familiarity (e.g., Humphreys, 1976Humphreys, , 1978Humphreys & Bain, 1983) 5 and that R equals the probability of recollection conditional on familiarity. The expressions for the inclusion and exclusion probabilities are given in Equations 6 and 7.…”
Section: Final Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that the answer is that the existing analyses of these data support dual processes or dual factors but do not discriminate between independence and dependence. For example, assume that recollection is completely dependent on familiarity (e.g., Humphreys, 1976Humphreys, , 1978Humphreys & Bain, 1983) 5 and that R equals the probability of recollection conditional on familiarity. The expressions for the inclusion and exclusion probabilities are given in Equations 6 and 7.…”
Section: Final Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%