2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2020.102909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and specificity of Red blood cell alloantibodies in multitransfused Egyptian patients with hematological and nonhematological malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"The finding is lower and at variance with previous findings that reported frequency of alloimmunization to be 18.7 % among the previously transfused and 5 % in all sickle cell disease patients with a specificity of 46.7 % Rhesus, 40 % Kell, while Lutheran and Duffy 13.3 %, each as well as auto-antibodies in 1.25 %" [16]. It is also at variance with the report of El Fetouh and colleagues who reported prevalence of different alloantibodies as 9.16% with some having more than 1 antibody detected in a patient with haematological malignancies at Egypt with f alloantibodies specificity as the Rh system [45.3% with specificity of anti-E (21.3%) and anti-D (6.4%), anti-C (9.4%) and anti-c (8.2%)], followed by Kell (25.1%), Duffy (13.9%), MNS (7.5%), Kidd (7.1%), and Lewis (1.1%) [17]. It is also at variance with the report of Hussein and colleagues who recorded alloimmunization incidence as 22.8% with 37.4% Rh-related alloantibody followed by 26% anti-Kell, 8.9% anti-MNS 8.9% anti-Kidd, 8.1% anti-Duffy, 5.7% anti-Le, 2.4% anti-Lu and 1.6% anti-P1 [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The finding is lower and at variance with previous findings that reported frequency of alloimmunization to be 18.7 % among the previously transfused and 5 % in all sickle cell disease patients with a specificity of 46.7 % Rhesus, 40 % Kell, while Lutheran and Duffy 13.3 %, each as well as auto-antibodies in 1.25 %" [16]. It is also at variance with the report of El Fetouh and colleagues who reported prevalence of different alloantibodies as 9.16% with some having more than 1 antibody detected in a patient with haematological malignancies at Egypt with f alloantibodies specificity as the Rh system [45.3% with specificity of anti-E (21.3%) and anti-D (6.4%), anti-C (9.4%) and anti-c (8.2%)], followed by Kell (25.1%), Duffy (13.9%), MNS (7.5%), Kidd (7.1%), and Lewis (1.1%) [17]. It is also at variance with the report of Hussein and colleagues who recorded alloimmunization incidence as 22.8% with 37.4% Rh-related alloantibody followed by 26% anti-Kell, 8.9% anti-MNS 8.9% anti-Kidd, 8.1% anti-Duffy, 5.7% anti-Le, 2.4% anti-Lu and 1.6% anti-P1 [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with sickle cell disease are more at risk of developing alloimmunisation, which makes cross-matching and suitable blood for transfusions problematic when the issues of minor antigens are not considered during the transfusion [ 58 , 119 ]. According to Boateng et al [ 123 ], the frequency of alloantibody development in patients with SCD is as high as 76% compared to the general population [ 124 ]. The frequency of red blood cell alloimmunisation in SCD patients may not be the same in every part of the world due to blood transfusion rates, ethnic mismatch, and the age of the initial transfusion [ 20 , 125 , 126 ].…”
Section: The Cause Of High Alloimmunisation In Scd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%