1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1986.tb01983.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency dependence of Q in the mantle underlying the shield areas of Eurasia, Part I: analyses of long period data

Abstract: The results ot' short and intermediate period data analyses for the determination of ;i frequency dependent (L model of the niantlc under the shield areas of Eurasia are presented. The spectra of short period P-waves from nuclear explosions in the 1-8 Hz frequency range give $-0.15-0.2 s.Using recordings of Soviet nuclear explosions at NORSAR, P-wave profiles were assembled t o study Q in the upper mantle under the Russian-Fennoscandian shield. Analyses of the relative amplitudes and frequency contents of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared in the same table are short period results obtained for P-wave spectral shapes cited from various studies (e.g. Der & Lees 1985;Der & McElfresh 1977;Der et al , 1986). The regional variation in the long-and short-period bands assume a similar pattern to long-period ScS results where the t* is higher in the tectonically active regions and lower in the more stable shield regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Compared in the same table are short period results obtained for P-wave spectral shapes cited from various studies (e.g. Der & Lees 1985;Der & McElfresh 1977;Der et al , 1986). The regional variation in the long-and short-period bands assume a similar pattern to long-period ScS results where the t* is higher in the tectonically active regions and lower in the more stable shield regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The shear loss mechanism of attenuation translates into the approximate relationship t* s = 4 t* p when the typical mantle velocities for P and S waves are considered. The approximate validity of the relationship between shear wave and P-wave attenuation makes it possible to merge and jointly interpret P-and S-wave atenuation measurements (DER et al, 1986a;LEES et al, 1986) and thus make use of the greater sensitivity of S waves to build attenuation models (DER et al, 1986b).…”
Section: Teleseismic Energy Loss In the Short-period Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the function t*( f ) must be constructed for each path by piecing together various types of information consisting of spectral ratios between assumed source spectra and absolute Q estimates derived from source independent amplitude decay measurements. Additional constraints may be provided from S-wave measurements, making the assumption that most losses occur in shear deformation (DER and LEES, 1985;DER et al, 1986a).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface-wave studies allow observations of regional variations of the crustal and mantle attenuation down to about 400 km (e.g., PATTON, 1980;MITCHELL, 1995). However, short-period, body-wave attenuation measurements still remain very limited (DER et al, 1986a). Global attenuation models are dominated by oceanic areas, whereas mantle attenuation shows a wide range of regional variations, as well as with depth and frequency (e.g., MITCHELL, 1995;DER et al, 1986b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%