2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4739454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency division multiplexing readout and simultaneous manipulation of an array of flux qubits

Abstract: An important desired ingredient of superconducting quantum circuits is a readout scheme whose complexity does not increase with the number of qubits involved in the measurement. Here, we present a readout scheme employing a single microwave line, which enables simultaneous readout of multiple qubits. Consequently, scaling up superconducting qubit circuits is no longer limited by the readout apparatus. Parallel readout of 6 flux qubits using a frequency division multiplexing technique is demonstrated, as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While quasiparticles are the main candidate for energy relaxation, we do not exclude other potential sources, in particular loss due to amorphous interfaces and surfaces [25]. We note that lower energy relaxation times, in the 0.5 − 1 µs range, were obtained in previous experiments with aluminum flux qubits coupled to superconducting resonators made of niobium [16,17]. Possible reasons for the longer relaxation times in our experiment include a reduction of quasiparticle induced relaxation, due to using an all aluminum circuit, and a reduction of surface/interface loss arising due to the different processing prior to deposition of the qubit layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While quasiparticles are the main candidate for energy relaxation, we do not exclude other potential sources, in particular loss due to amorphous interfaces and surfaces [25]. We note that lower energy relaxation times, in the 0.5 − 1 µs range, were obtained in previous experiments with aluminum flux qubits coupled to superconducting resonators made of niobium [16,17]. Possible reasons for the longer relaxation times in our experiment include a reduction of quasiparticle induced relaxation, due to using an all aluminum circuit, and a reduction of surface/interface loss arising due to the different processing prior to deposition of the qubit layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this study we investigate the driven dynamics of a strongly interacting system composed of a superconducting flux qubit [15,16] and a coplanar waveguide (CPW) microwave cavity [9,14,[17][18][19][20][21]. The nonlinear cavity response [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] is measured as a function of the magnetic flux that is applied to the qubit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a) and 1(b)]. The chip layout and the design philosophy of microwave elements mirror those of superconducting quantum processors [21][22][23]. In the absence of Josephson dynamics, the fundamental λ=2 resonance mode is characterized by the resonance frequency f ð0Þ r ¼ 5.6681 GHz, the internal and coupling quality factors Q ð0Þ i ¼ 3400 and Q c ¼ 760, respectively, and impedance Z lc ¼ ð2=πÞZ r , where Z r ¼ 30 Ω is the characteristic impedance of the waveguide.…”
Section: A Sample Designmentioning
confidence: 99%