2015 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements &Amp; Networking (M&N) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iwmn.2015.7322972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency domain measurement node based on compressive sampling for sensors networks

Abstract: The paper deals with the problem of designing and implementing a measurement node based on compressive sampling (CS). The considered node is tailored for wide area sensors networks aimed to carry out measurements in frequency domain. To this aim, the node takes advantage from some known or recently proposed CS features in such a way as to outperform the nominal specification of its data acquisition module. To make the spectrum estimation feasible on the node level, a suitable strategy for input signal random s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this quantity, 3σ bounds is also reported. Differently from what can be expected for a low-cost sensor, experienced non-linearity and phase displacement are compatible with zero [26]. As regards the deviation ∆V, its absolute value remains lower than 0.4 mV, whereas the experimental standard deviation of 100 measures exhibits slight variations with respect to the input voltage, so that the 3σ is always lower than 0.5 mV.…”
Section: Analog Front Endcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…For this quantity, 3σ bounds is also reported. Differently from what can be expected for a low-cost sensor, experienced non-linearity and phase displacement are compatible with zero [26]. As regards the deviation ∆V, its absolute value remains lower than 0.4 mV, whereas the experimental standard deviation of 100 measures exhibits slight variations with respect to the input voltage, so that the 3σ is always lower than 0.5 mV.…”
Section: Analog Front Endcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The main used protocols for IoT agricultural and livestock farming applications are: (i) the Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol, (ii) the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP), (iii) the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), (iv) the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), (v) the Data Distribution Service (DDS) protocol, (vi) the Representational State Transfer Hypertext Transfer Protocol (REST HTTP), and (vii) the WebSocket protocol. In [40], it is shown that in most cases MQTT outperforms the other IoT protocols, while the use of CoAP protocol can be considered as the next best option since it attains very promising performance in most network performance indicators.…”
Section: Iot For Smart Livestock Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To suitably overcome the main drawback associated with wired communication networks, solutions exploiting wireless communication technologies, operating in either licensed or free frequency bands [19] can be investigated. As for licensed bands, the communication infrastructure is owned by telecommunications companies, and the related installation and maintenance costs do not directly burden the power companies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%